'Queer' fits quite nicely under the 'G' part, and I always despair a little
when I see the 'I' and 'T' lumped in with the 'L', 'G' and 'B' as if
they're the same thing.
Basically, with this alphabet soup, you're going to offend someone always
no matter what you do.
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:05 AM
On Monday, 2 July 2012 at 06:24, koltzenb...@w4w.net wrote:
> Hi Tom, hi @all
>
> > Wikimedia have decided to allow the list to be created
>
> since we are addressing not only one gender gap but, seemingly quite a few,
> including those that come alonf
> the lines of what has come to be called
ah, thanks, Michelle,
so it seems you and me see different gaps in different places :-) interesting,
let's see what might emerge in
contributions by others: everyone sees different gender gaps, I guess,
so where is the gap for you @all?
and where the possible bridges?
thanks
Claudia
On Mon, 2
Just to clarify, Phillipe expressed concern that there were only 4
people listed as potential participants. The main objection was from
MZMcBride (who is not associated with the WMF), who expressed concern
that the list would be used for POV-pushing. Subsequently, Sébastien
Santoro and two WMF
thanks, Ryan
so this seems clear now: there may be different kinds of difficulties in a list
creation process and all of these
are now solved as regards the new lgbt list, is that it?
cheers
Claudia
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:51:57 -0700, Ryan Kaldari wrote
> Just to clarify, Phillipe expressed co
Thanks for starting this list and for letting us know Tom.
Joining now,
Sarah
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Tom Morris wrote:
> On Sunday, 1 July 2012 at 22:30, Tom Morris wrote:
> > I'm happy to announce that a new Wikimedia LGBT mailing list has been
> setup. For the time being, it is bein
