I got one and promptly unsubscribed. I don't do google groups, and every
time someone has invited me to one, I've found they were not to my taste.
Risker/Anne
On 1 December 2014 at 02:08, Alison Cassidy wrote:
> I didn't get one. Now, I feel cheated! :D
>
> -- Allie
>
> On Nov 30, 2014, a
I didn't get one. Now, I feel cheated! :D
-- Allie
> On Nov 30, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Leigh Honeywell wrote:
>
> Someone purporting to be Russavia appears to have added a number of people
> from this list to a Google Group with a similar title to this list. Wearing
> my mod hat, I just want
Someone purporting to be Russavia appears to have added a number of people
from this list to a Google Group with a similar title to this list. Wearing
my mod hat, I just want to be clear: this list isn't going anywhere, the
Google Group is not WMF-sanctioned as far as I know, and scraping list
memb
Thanks Sarah,
Yes, they does seem to be a lot more of it lately. I also thought that
discussion board stuff would die down. They got their pound of flesh and now
they seem to want blood as well.
I pretty much stayed off the boards but I was drawn in by a "Hey-let's-move-on"
style opening post
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Marie Earley wrote:
> In answer to your other questions:
> * Please explain why this is relevant to the gender gap, since you are
> sending it out to everyone on the gender gap mailing list?
> - Please explain why you think it isn't relevant, since the opening li
Reclaim the night have just celebrated their 10th anniversary here in the UK
http://www.reclaimthenight.co.uk/
I like the idea, not sure what it would look like in practice. I can't help
thinking we have them already with women's edit-a-thons. The thing that strikes
me about them is they tend t
I'm getting my GG notifications through now.
JJ Marr: Re: context, I was having trouble getting the GG e-mails so I couldn't
hit reply and keep my messages in the same thread (although I did use the same
title). It should have been the next message in this thread:
https://lists.wikimedia.or
On 11/30/2014 11:51 AM, Kathleen McCook wrote:
The only solution would be lack of anonymity. That won't fly, but it
would cause the creepiness to go away.
I used to think that too. But some people don't care about people
knowing who they are, what they think or who the mess with. I don't
ca
On 11/30/2014 1:36 PM, Risker wrote:
Well, hold on. The content dispute that is being described is one
that rages within the feminist community (note the lack of gender
there - it encompasses people of all genders), and is not a male vs
female thing. Often as not, it is women disagreeing on t
This is just opinion. Thank you for ending the conversation.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Risker wrote:
> Well, hold on. The content dispute that is being described is one that
> rages within the feminist community (note the lack of gender there - it
> encompasses people of all genders), an
Well, hold on. The content dispute that is being described is one that
rages within the feminist community (note the lack of gender there - it
encompasses people of all genders), and is not a male vs female thing.
Often as not, it is women disagreeing on the definitions amongst
themselves. The sa
You could go to Citizendium, considering that has a lack of anonymity and
strict civility rules.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizendium
http://citizendium.org/
On Nov 30, 2014 11:52 AM, "Kathleen McCook" wrote:
> The only solution would be lack of anonymity. That won't fly, but it would
> ca
The only solution would be lack of anonymity. That won't fly, but it would
cause the creepiness to go away.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:42 AM, JJ Marr wrote:
> What do you propose a "take back the night" would be like?
> On Nov 30, 2014 8:12 AM, "Kathleen McCook" wrote:
>
>> Yes, one can see eas
What do you propose a "take back the night" would be like?
On Nov 30, 2014 8:12 AM, "Kathleen McCook" wrote:
> Yes, one can see easily how they move from topic to topic. Connected and
> ensuring their POV dominates.
>
> The issue of feminism should not be defined by men whose motivation seems
> t
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Carol Moore dc
wrote:
> my joke about the "systemic bias card" (which is evidence against me in
> Arbitration!);
>
Yeah, this is one of the more bizarre diffs. I am glad a couple of
arbitrators opposed on the basis of that. I would be even happier if it
were st
Pulling out a couple of comments for reply from Marie's statement:
On 11/30/2014 1:46 AM, Marie Earley wrote:
..
In particular this comment:
"...As has been indicated on the talk page of the proposed decision,
/repeatedly,/ there is some question as to exactly /which/ women this
group seems to
Yes, one can see easily how they move from topic to topic. Connected and
ensuring their POV dominates.
The issue of feminism should not be defined by men whose motivation seems
to be to create an environment where women are "free" to be what they (the
men discussed here ) imagine to us to be.
I
17 matches
Mail list logo
