Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg
unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das
Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
2014-12-14 23:06 GMT+01:00 Jim Hayes slowki...@gmail.com:
yes, training could work at wikimania
the education
https://hbr.org/2012/03/a-study-in-leadership-women-do/
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
thank you kevin;
i appreciate the spirit that the remarks are taken
i do not appreciate being outed by an arbitrator
linking a private email message to a public talk page.
i would say this conduct amply justifies the remarks i have made about
arbcom in public elsewhere.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at
i say if you would attend,
the challenge is to organize one
(said by the serial attender)
the nice thing about glamcamp
was training; empowering editors to organize events;
it could start as a low cost, wikisalon, then move to editathon
(if you build some contacts with an institution)
does take
there is a lack of continuity studying editing behaviors,
it is all one-off studies, not longitudinal
they only know editor decline because it's an easy data dump.
that said, there is some data from editations being gathered by eval
testing group.
we fund editathons because the primary goal is
wikimedia dc gave out some awards
(no money involved, plaque)
https://www.facebook.com/wikimediadc
i'm sure Keilana could be prevailed upon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keilana
i was trying to test a ribbon and barnstar (re-gifted from mindspillage)
one take away is how few voters there are.
we have a lot of feminist editathons coming up
should we consider recruiting at events to get new editors over 150 edits,
with a view of block voting in next year's election?
if we organize now, we could run a civility slate of candidates.
On Tue, Dec
back to her open data sets...
:-)
Sarah
On Dec 10, 2014 6:08 AM, Jim Hayes slowki...@gmail.com wrote:
there is a lack of continuity studying editing behaviors,
it is all one-off studies, not longitudinal
they only know editor decline because it's an easy data dump.
that said, there is some
yes ,
i would say that arbcom might be unaware of how negatively it will be viewed
clearly newyorkbrad was angling for block both sides,
to make it easier to block the unblockable
and the majority appears to have tilted in one direction.
keep in mind that a life ban worked real well on betacommand
i take it you are aware of arbitration
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration
it works where there is buy-in
but there are many cases where not working, and things taken to ani and
arbcom.
these are broken processes.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Krystle krys...@wikihow.com
10 matches
Mail list logo
