Re: [Gendergap] coordination work off-wikie

2014-11-30 Thread Carol Moore dc
On 11/30/2014 1:36 PM, Risker wrote: Well, hold on. The content dispute that is being described is one that rages within the feminist community (note the lack of gender there - it encompasses people of all genders), and is not a male vs female thing. Often as not, it is women disagreeing on t

Re: [Gendergap] coordination work off-wikie

2014-11-30 Thread Kathleen McCook
This is just opinion. Thank you for ending the conversation. On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Risker wrote: > Well, hold on. The content dispute that is being described is one that > rages within the feminist community (note the lack of gender there - it > encompasses people of all genders), an

Re: [Gendergap] coordination work off-wikie

2014-11-30 Thread Risker
Well, hold on. The content dispute that is being described is one that rages within the feminist community (note the lack of gender there - it encompasses people of all genders), and is not a male vs female thing. Often as not, it is women disagreeing on the definitions amongst themselves. The sa

Re: [Gendergap] coordination work off-wikie

2014-11-30 Thread JJ Marr
What do you propose a "take back the night" would be like? On Nov 30, 2014 8:12 AM, "Kathleen McCook" wrote: > Yes, one can see easily how they move from topic to topic. Connected and > ensuring their POV dominates. > > The issue of feminism should not be defined by men whose motivation seems > t

[Gendergap] coordination work off-wikie

2014-11-30 Thread Kathleen McCook
Yes, one can see easily how they move from topic to topic. Connected and ensuring their POV dominates. The issue of feminism should not be defined by men whose motivation seems to be to create an environment where women are "free" to be what they (the men discussed here ) imagine to us to be. I