Anyway they can italic or bold this Phrase: " in a private place or
situation without permission." ??
On 9/12/2011 10:53 AM, Sydney Poore wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Sarah Stierch
mailto:sarah.stie...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have no clue how I missed this (and perhaps it's been p
On 13/09/2011 03:31, phoebe ayers wrote:
> there are
> images in debatable circumstances (beach: public or not?)
In France there is a jurisprudence regarding photos of monuments and
other public places worthy of photography.
It states that you are allowed to have non consenting people on your
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:47 PM, phoebe ayers wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Sydney Poore
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Sarah Stierch
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I have no clue how I missed this (and perhaps it's been posted before?)
> >>
> >>
> http://wikimediafoundation.or
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Sydney -- all good ideas, for sure! The resolution was intended as a
>> (re)focusing device, as you note; and there is still lots of work to
>> be done. One of the areas is making sure that all wikis have a similar
>> policy. Would it
On 9/12/11 5:27 PM, Fred Bauder wrote:
>
> I agree, but it can be a punishing process. The "right" place is the talk
> pages of policy pages.
Patience and experience will defeat aggression and youthful vigor every
time.
___
Gendergap mailing
>
>
> On 9/12/11 3:58 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm not sure if we're ready to move it to meta yet, I do wish we had a
>> more private place to develop this. It's a rather sensitive topic for
>> folks. Perhaps a google doc or...?
>
> To be honest, I think that working as publicly as
>
> To be honest, I think that working as publicly as possible is only
> good, in the long run, for what needs to happen. Transparency is super
> important.
>
>
I suppose it's paranoia that makes me sensitive about making it "so
transparent" in an infant stage. But, if we have to place it s
On 9/12/11 3:58 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
>
>
> I'm not sure if we're ready to move it to meta yet, I do wish we had a
> more private place to develop this. It's a rather sensitive topic for
> folks. Perhaps a google doc or...?
To be honest, I think that working as publicly as possible i
> Sydney -- all good ideas, for sure! The resolution was intended as a
> (re)focusing device, as you note; and there is still lots of work to
> be done. One of the areas is making sure that all wikis have a similar
> policy. Would it help to put together a page on meta to coordinate
> this?
>
>
I'
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Sydney Poore wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Sarah Stierch
> wrote:
>>
>> I have no clue how I missed this (and perhaps it's been posted before?)
>>
>> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Images_of_identifiable_people
>>
>> Perhaps we can lend
They don't appear to be in any questionable or exploitative situations. I would
like to think you did ask their verbal permission or informed them that they
represent their town on Wikipedia. I have learned to avoid people in images
without strict permission after having an anthropologist as a
>>
>>
> +1. There are hundreds of photographs of women sunbathing, walking down
> the
> street, etc. It makes me severely uncomfortable that we have people
> taking
> photographs of people in a voyeuristic manner uploading images to
> Commons,
> Flickr, whatever. Just because someone (of any gende
>
> IMO, the Commons policy needs to be tweaked to to ensure that the person
> giving consent for the image to be taken understands that it will be
> uploaded with a free license, and what that means.
>
>
Yes, there doesn't really seem to be an appropriate representation about
this. I also think it
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
> I have no clue how I missed this (and perhaps it's been posted before?)
>
> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Images_of_identifiable_people
>
> Perhaps we can lend a hand to assist in this?
>
> -Sarah
>
Yes, the WMF Board passed
14 matches
Mail list logo
