svn commit: r1888260 - /attic/site/docs/tracking.html

2021-03-31 Thread buildbot
Author: buildbot Date: Thu Apr 1 06:03:18 2021 New Revision: 1888260 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1888260&view=rev Log: Automatic Site Publish by Buildbot Modified: attic/site/docs/tracking.html Modified: attic/site/docs/tracking.html URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/attic/site/d

svn commit: r1888259 - /attic/site/xdocs/tracking.xml

2021-03-31 Thread hboutemy
Author: hboutemy Date: Thu Apr 1 06:03:09 2021 New Revision: 1888259 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1888259&view=rev Log: ATTIC-176 Falcon is now retired Modified: attic/site/xdocs/tracking.xml Modified: attic/site/xdocs/tracking.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/attic/site/xdoc

[jira] [Updated] (ATTIC-176) Move Apache Falcon to the Attic

2021-03-31 Thread Herve Boutemy (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Herve Boutemy updated ATTIC-176: Description: # Confirm Board Resolution (if TLP) [(/)|https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Falco

[jira] [Closed] (ATTIC-176) Move Apache Falcon to the Attic

2021-03-31 Thread Herve Boutemy (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Herve Boutemy closed ATTIC-176. --- Resolution: Fixed > Move Apache Falcon to the Attic > --- > >

Re: Renaming of Git repos when moving to Attic

2021-03-31 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
looking at Falcon retirement [1], which has a Git repo: - current Gitbox repo is attic-falcon.git [2] - but GitHub (where everybody is looking at) is still falcon.git [3] And on GitHub, a clear sign of retirement for users exists, that has not been activated on this falcon.git: that is **archived

Re: Renaming of Git repos when moving to Attic

2021-03-31 Thread sebb
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 08:37, Mads Toftum wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 01:02:58AM +0100, sebb wrote: > > Infra say that the rename of the Git repos was to allow write access > > by Attic people. > > I assume that the attic- prefix turns it into an Attic-controlled repo. > > > > This would al

Re: Renaming of Git repos when moving to Attic

2021-03-31 Thread Mads Toftum
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 07:51:28AM +0200, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > now that requiring write access means not only cumbersome efforts but also > breaking Git repositories for end users (by renaming), yes, I'm confident > we're > sufficiently prepared to say that we don't need write access at all >

Re: Renaming of Git repos when moving to Attic

2021-03-31 Thread Mads Toftum
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 01:02:58AM +0100, sebb wrote: > Infra say that the rename of the Git repos was to allow write access > by Attic people. > I assume that the attic- prefix turns it into an Attic-controlled repo. > > This would allow Attic access and deny project access. > > Project access c