On 2 May 2018 at 11:08, Jan Iversen wrote:
>
>
>> On 2 May 2018, at 11:49, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 2 May 2018 at 10:33, Jan Iversen wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 2 May 2018, at 11:09, sebb wrote:
Top-posting.
> On 2 May 2018, at 11:49, sebb wrote:
>
> On 2 May 2018 at 10:33, Jan Iversen wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 2 May 2018, at 11:09, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> Top-posting.
>>>
>>> Surely any discussion which relates to personnel should take
On 2 May 2018 at 10:33, Jan Iversen wrote:
>
>
>> On 2 May 2018, at 11:09, sebb wrote:
>>
>> Top-posting.
>>
>> Surely any discussion which relates to personnel should take place on
>> the private@ list?
>
> Surely not, a discussion/vote for a new chair
> On 2 May 2018, at 11:09, sebb wrote:
>
> Top-posting.
>
> Surely any discussion which relates to personnel should take place on
> the private@ list?
Surely not, a discussion/vote for a new chair is something that involves the
whole community and not only the PMC.
It is
Top-posting.
Surely any discussion which relates to personnel should take place on
the private@ list?
On 1 May 2018 at 21:46, Jan Iversen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am truly sorry having to write this email. I am embarrassed of not being
> able to keep my promise and stay as a
gt;> Subject: Discussion to select chair candidates followed by a vote starting
>> may
>> 13 2018.
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> I thought the plan was to reach consensus, and otherwise vote.
yes it was, but I still have the (to me) ugly -1 discussion on your rewrite
rules i
On Tue, 1 May 2018, Jan Iversen wrote:
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 22:46:41 +0200
From: Jan Iversen <j...@apache.org>
To: general@attic.apache.org
Subject: Discussion to select chair candidates followed by a vote starting may
13 2018.
Hi Jan,
I thought the plan was to reach con
Hi
I am truly sorry having to write this email. I am embarrassed of not being able
to keep my promise and stay as a long-term chair, but sometimes you have to ask
yourself is it worth the time spent and instead use time where it is makes a
difference.
Considering we have a very silent