Thanks for the help!
David
On Oct 22, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Gajanan Chinchwadkar
wrote:
> If an xpath expression has a predicate with value, then element range index
> will be used, if available.
> For example, in the following two cases a range index on xs:QName("title")
> will be used:
> a.
If an xpath expression has a predicate with value, then element range index
will be used, if available.
For example, in the following two cases a range index on xs:QName("title") will
be used:
a. /bookstore/book[title="XQuery Programming"]
b. /bookstore/book[title="XQuery Programming"]/author
I would rephrase this as "does the evaluator ever use indexes for where
clauses?" If indexes are used at all, I would expect ranges to work too. And
with 6.0-1.1 the answer seems to be "yes" - but I would still recommend doing
as much as possible in XPath predicates.
Here's a contrived test. In
Not sure about 1,2,, and 4. But dynamic function calls are already in ML 6.
http://maxdewpoint.blogspot.com/2012/10/higher-order-functions-in-marklogic-6.html
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 7:28 AM, David Sargeant wrote:
> I was just curious what the roadmap is for the following XQuery 3.0
> feature
On 10/22/2012 10:38 AM, Florent Georges wrote:
>But my concern is that the name is not stable. You can change
> the name of one database, and in that case I want the config to
> still point to the same database. Of course, I always display
> the name instead of the ID in the user interface ;-
I'm wondering if ML uses a range index in the where portion of a FLOWR
expression where applicable. I could only find examples of 'order by'. Thanks.
David___
General mailing list
General@developer.marklogic.com
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailma
Mike Sokolov wrote:
Hi,
> So if you have, say, a development setup and a production
> setup, they can share the same database names, but not the same
> database ids. You can always get the id for a name using
> xdmp:database()
But my concern is that the name is not stable. You can change
t
FWIW, we generally use the database names rather than their ids in our
configuration files. It's just easier to see what's going on if you
have a lot of configuration data to sort through, and as Michael
Blakeley pointed out, the ids won't be portable. So if you have, say, a
development setup
I was just curious what the roadmap is for the following XQuery 3.0 features:
1. group by clause in FLWOR Expressions
2. allowing empty in for clause
3. Dynamic function calls
4. count clause in FLWOR Expressions
Thanks,
David___
General mailing
Hi
Is there any way in MarkLogic to Validate a schema (which have Schematron
internally)
Till now,
I have used Schema to validate the XML data and it went on well with commands
like (validate strict <> and validate full >)
After having a requirement of performing conditional validation, I went
On 21/10/12 00:36, Ryan Dew wrote:
> Sorry, I realized my test was flawed and the map operator does seem to
> interfere with concurrency. Does anyone know if there is any benefit of
> using the map operator over a flwor other than simpler syntax?
Generally the simple map operator is evaluated lazi
Hi Florent,
Might be worth to have a look at the configuration manager that comes with
MarkLogic since 5.0..
Kind regards,
Geert
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com [mailto:general-
> boun...@developer.marklogic.com] Namens Florent Georges
> Verzonde
12 matches
Mail list logo
