[jira] Commented: (GUMP-76) Install Mono 1.0 on brutus

2004-08-04 Thread general
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Stefan Bodewig Created: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:13 AM Body: Ant's tests failed on the last run, while they pass in my Mono environment, maybe we've still been using Mono 0.30 at this time. I'll wait for the next Gump run.

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-commons-sandbox/commons-sql failed

2004-08-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Any idea why this doesn't show up in http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/project_todos.html? Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: gump/project jakarta-commons-sandbox.xml

2004-08-04 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2004/08/04 02:49:33 Modified:project jakarta-commons-sandbox.xml Log: jar location changed Revision ChangesPath 1.173 +1 -1 gump/project/jakarta-commons-sandbox.xml Index: jakarta-commons-sandbox.xml

BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-08-04 Thread brutus
to this information via syndicated feeds: RSS: http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-tapestry/ognl/rss.xml Atom: http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/jakarta-tapestry/ognl/atom.xml -- Gump E-mail Identifier (within run) #1. Produced by Gump 2.1.0-alpha-0002. [Run (20040804 00:00:12

cvs commit: gump/project jakarta-slide.xml

2004-08-04 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2004/08/04 02:51:43 Modified:project jakarta-slide.xml Log: Slide needs commons-codec Revision ChangesPath 1.68 +1 -0 gump/project/jakarta-slide.xml Index: jakarta-slide.xml ===

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-commons-sandbox/commons-sql failed

2004-08-04 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Any idea why this doesn't show up in http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/project_todos.html? I see it 6th from the top. I think the order of 'by affected' is important, but maybe a little chaotic. We could change that. Also, this page isn't created

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-commons-sandbox/commons-sql failed

2004-08-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Any idea why this doesn't show up in http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/project_todos.html? I see it 6th from the top. I still don't see it at all (even after restarting my browser and

Re: Spam hijacking Gump content...

2004-08-04 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Wednesday, August 4, 2004 11:49 AM -0700 Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a new one on me (and new for Gump, I believe). Gump's content was cloned to carry a bogus URL. http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED] he.orgmsgNo=54193 Note the nasty little URL inserted

Re: Spam hijacking Gump content...

2004-08-04 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Note the nasty little URL inserted at the top of the mail... Clever. Did they just take a message in the archive and prepend that line? I suspect they simply subscribed, and replied to the mail Gump just sent. That makes it seem a human action. That said, I've not examined headers or anything

Re: Spam hijacking Gump content...

2004-08-04 Thread Nick Chalko
Not sure what we can do about that. Especially if they are forging the envelope headers to be someone on the list. *shrug* How does Gump feel about digital signatures of its messages? ;-) -- justin That is a cool Idea, Several security concerns about the process running gump. Also then

Re: Spam hijacking Gump content...

2004-08-04 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Wednesday, August 4, 2004 12:33 PM -0700 Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suspect they simply subscribed, and replied to the mail Gump just sent. That makes it seem a human action. That said, I've not examined headers or anything to know. Ought the Jakarta PMC be notified? Sorry

Re: python@apache.org request submit to infrastructure@

2004-08-04 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Wednesday, August 4, 2004 8:50 PM -0700 Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Per the PMC vote of 6 +1s and no other votes, the Gump PMC have agreed to sponsor this mailing list. The following request has been submit to infrastructure. http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-100

svn commit: rev 35724 - gump/trunk/python/gump/core

2004-08-04 Thread None
Author: None Date: Wed Aug 4 21:03:08 2004 New Revision: 35724 Modified: gump/trunk/python/gump/core/config.py Log: Since the re-org, base has been off by '..' Modified: gump/trunk/python/gump/core/config.py == ---

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-commons-sandbox/commons-sql failed

2004-08-04 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Any idea why this doesn't show up in http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/project_todos.html? Hmm, no ... none. Now it is gone for me, likely my browser was caching. What is odd is it doesn't show here now either. http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/project_fixes.html ... yet it appears to be

Re: python@apache.org request submit to infrastructure@

2004-08-04 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Wednesday, August 4, 2004 8:50 PM -0700 Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Per the PMC vote of 6 +1s and no other votes, the Gump PMC have agreed to sponsor this mailing list. The following request has been submit to infrastructure.

Re: [GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-commons-sandbox/commons-sql failed

2004-08-04 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
I'll noodle on it. Ahhh ... noodled. I think the fact that the re-org incorrectly shifted the base (not workspace basedir, but base for Gump internal stuff -- something I'd like to fix one day) up the stats DBM file was re-created. I can't put my finger on it, but I bet there is a problem