BATCH: Unable to send...

2004-10-11 Thread brutus
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 2 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project avalon-tools-magic (in module avalon-trunk) failed [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ws-wsif (in module ws-wsif) failed

Re: BATCH: Unable to send...

2004-10-11 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Sorry folks, that change I made to ant's jar ids (to match Maven's and stop duplicates, and clashes with junit etc.) ...causes these knock on problems. > The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: > -DEBUG- Sole output [avalon-tools-magic-11102004.ja

BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-10-11 Thread brutus
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 2 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jgen (in module jgen) failed [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-sslext (in module struts-sslext) failed **

Re: BATCH: Unable to send...

2004-10-11 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Monday 11 October 2004 22:32, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > Sorry folks, that change I made to ant's jar ids (to match Maven's and stop > duplicates, and clashes with junit etc.) ...causes these knock on > problems. No worries. Taken care of... :o) Thanks, and we are now about to push above 80%

Calls into Gump

2004-10-11 Thread Adam Jack
Stefano, To load a Workspace one ought use the WorkspaceLoader to load it (ws here is a path/filename): # get parsed workspace definition from gump.core.loader.loader import WorkspaceLoader workspace=WorkspaceLoader().load(ws) To get a GumpRun (wrapper around a workspace), do:

Re: cvs commit: gump/project dougLea.xml

2004-10-11 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Sorry, duplicate of what? Lots of folks are using 'concurrent', and the build dies w/o it there ('cos it is told to find a package there -- need to fix that). Anyhow ... where was the duplicate? regards, Adam - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Mo

Re: cvs commit: gump/project dougLea.xml

2004-10-11 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 12 October 2004 01:14, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > Sorry, duplicate of what? Lots of folks are using 'concurrent', and the > build dies w/o it there ('cos it is told to find a package there -- need to > fix that). Anyhow ... where was the duplicate? [EMAIL PROTECTED] project]$ grep -r conc

Gump descriptors for Fulcrum components.

2004-10-11 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Hi, I am working on pulling more projects in under the Gump umbrella, and just asked Maven to generate all the Gump descriptors for the Fulcrum components. These are now being added to the gump/project/jakarta-turbine-fulcrum.xml module in Gump, which you all committers can modify. Any help t

Re: cvs commit: gump/project dougLea.xml

2004-10-11 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: Sorry, duplicate of what? Lots of folks are using 'concurrent', and the build dies w/o it there ('cos it is told to find a package there -- need to fix that). Anyhow ... where was the duplicate? I'm an idiot! I grepped for "dougLea" as the project name and I didn't find anyt

Re: cvs commit: gump/project dougLea.xml

2004-10-11 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> > I'm an idiot! I grepped for "dougLea" as the project name and I didn't > find anything so I removed it. Not your fault. Gump needs better validation and query tools so we don't have to use grep. Since you are working on those, you get a free pass this time. ;-) > sooo sorry folks No problem,

on not throwing the baby with the bath water

2004-10-11 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
I have a terrible problem when I get excited about something: I have an urge to clean things up first. Normally, it works out fine, but I have to put a lot of energy and the community is destabilized. I decided to work against this urge now and work incrementally for where we are. I have alread

Re: Gump descriptors for Fulcrum components.

2004-10-11 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Niclas Hedhman wrote: Hi, I am working on pulling more projects in under the Gump umbrella Niclas, hmmm wouldn't it be better if we stabilized the ones we already have before bringing new ones in? -- Stefano. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [RT] fixing gump

2004-10-11 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
David Crossley wrote: If we knew there was a DTD for Gump descriptors then we would be using it. http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/gump/dtd/project.dtd?rev=1.7 -- Stefano. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Excalibur 'equilibrium' needs 'avalon-framework' fixes.

2004-10-11 Thread Adam Jack
Folks We are making lots of good progress with getting 100% gump'ed builds, but we are stuck with a few more cases where Excalibur's Maven POMs refer to 'avalon-framework' and not to the "three parts" (avalon-framework-api, avalon-framework-impl, avalon-framework-legacy.) Could somebody look into

[jira] Created: (GUMP-82) Keep only the jars from the last successful build

2004-10-11 Thread general
Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUMP-82 Here is an overview of the issue: - Ke

Re: on not throwing the baby with the bath water

2004-10-11 Thread Scott Sanders
On Oct 11, 2004, at 2:21 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: I have a terrible problem when I get excited about something: I have an urge to clean things up first. Normally, it works out fine, but I have to put a lot of energy and the community is destabilized. But we love you anyways :) This is not the

Re: Excalibur 'equilibrium' needs 'avalon-framework' fixes.

2004-10-11 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 12 October 2004 06:03, Adam Jack wrote: > Folks > > We are making lots of good progress with getting 100% gump'ed builds, but > we are stuck with a few more cases where Excalibur's Maven POMs refer to > 'avalon-framework' and not to the "three parts" (avalon-framework-api, > avalon-frame

Re: Gump descriptors for Fulcrum components.

2004-10-11 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 12 October 2004 05:23, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am working on pulling more projects in under the Gump umbrella > > Niclas, > > hmmm wouldn't it be better if we stabilized the ones we already have > before bringing new ones in? :o) Well, I got s

Re: Gump descriptors for Fulcrum components.

2004-10-11 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> If you still think it is a bad idea, I can always revert the descriptor. Nah, bring it on, you thinking was good. :-) Sure we'd all love to see Excalibur build (and thanks very much for your help there), and we'd love to get to 100%, but I see not harm in bringing in new good work. regards Ad

Re: Gump descriptors for Fulcrum components.

2004-10-11 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> > If you still think it is a bad idea, I can always revert the descriptor. > > Nah, bring it on, you thinking was good. :-) Amazing how unintentionally rude a dropped letter can be. "your". :-) regards Adam - To unsubscribe

Re: Gump descriptors for Fulcrum components.

2004-10-11 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 12 October 2004 09:37, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > > > If you still think it is a bad idea, I can always revert the > > > descriptor. > > > > Nah, bring it on, you thinking was good. :-) > > Amazing how unintentionally rude a dropped letter can be. "your". :-) No problems, mate. AutoCorrre

RE: Excalibur 'equilibrium' needs 'avalon-framework' fixes.

2004-10-11 Thread Stephen McConnell
> -Original Message- > From: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 October 2004 02:56 > To: Gump code and data > Subject: Re: Excalibur 'equilibrium' needs 'avalon-framework' fixes. > > On Tuesday 12 October 2004 06:03, Adam Jack wrote: > > Folks > > > > We are making lots