Re: Gump on Moof

2004-03-26 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert
Adam Jack wrote: I know we are about to install on new hardware, but do we wish to send the moof install live? Surely having an OSX run is a good thing, since it allows greater coverage. If we chose to proceed, I think we need: 1) A 'gump' account on moof that we can su to. 2) A cronjob in that

Re: New software on moof (Re: Gump on moof)

2004-03-17 Thread Wilfredo Sánchez
FYI- I've put in a service request (had to learn how) to allow port 80, in case this is actually doable. I also requested outbound port 25 to mail.apache.org. -wsv On Mar 17, 2004, at 2:13 PM, Wilfredo Sánchez wrote: And I configured it to listen on port 8080, which appears to be ac

RE: New software on moof (Re: Gump on moof)

2004-03-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> Infrastructure@ I need you guys to change the proxy from port 16080 > to 8080 for gump.apache.org. Done. Just waiting for an httpdadmin to do a cvs up and graceful. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New software on moof (Re: Gump on moof)

2004-03-17 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Wilfredo Sánchez wrote: I prefer 2.0 myself, so let's use that. I'd switched the startup item to use it, and config is /usr/local/apache/conf. I also turned off the web performance cache, which I know little about and therefore distrust. And I configured it to listen on port 8080, which

Re: New software on moof (Re: Gump on moof)

2004-03-17 Thread Wilfredo Sánchez
I prefer 2.0 myself, so let's use that. I'd switched the startup item to use it, and config is /usr/local/apache/conf. I also turned off the web performance cache, which I know little about and therefore distrust. And I configured it to listen on port 8080, which appears to be accessibl

Re: New software on moof (Re: Gump on moof)

2004-03-17 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Wilfredo Sánchez wrote: On Mar 16, 2004, at 7:04 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Fred, we would like to have gump sending notice emails to the groups when failures appear, can we relay from moof? if not, what's the alternative? We can relay through mail.opensource.apple.com, which is on the sa

Re: New software on moof (Re: Gump on moof)

2004-03-16 Thread Wilfredo Sánchez
Cool. Let me know if it has any trouble. -wsv On Mar 16, 2004, at 9:32 PM, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: Gumpy uses Python's SMTP library, so we ought be able to just teach it this server & use default port. Thanks. - To unsu

Re: New software on moof (Re: Gump on moof)

2004-03-16 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
>We can relay through mail.opensource.apple.com, which is on the same > subnet. Postfix needs to be set up if we want delivery with > /usr/sbin/sendmail, etc. to work. If you just need an SMTP server, > mail.opensource.apple.com should do. I don't know what gump needs. Gumpy uses Python's S

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-16 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
>> I'm not sure what needs to happen with the Apache config. I think >> moof needs a new httpd.conf. The current one is the OS X Server >> default, which is mildy wonky. > >I can take care of this. > >Adam, tell me what you want and I'll set it up. Something along the lines

Re: New software on moof (Re: Gump on moof)

2004-03-16 Thread Wilfredo Sánchez
On Mar 16, 2004, at 7:04 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Fred, we would like to have gump sending notice emails to the groups when failures appear, can we relay from moof? if not, what's the alternative? We can relay through mail.opensource.apple.com, which is on the same subnet. Postfix needs

Re: New software on moof (Re: Gump on moof)

2004-03-16 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Wilfredo Sánchez wrote: Some new software on moof: apr, apr-util, httpd are in /usr/local/apache bdb is in /usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.2 expat is in /usr/local/expat libxml2 is in /usr/local/libxml neon is in /usr/local/neon swig is in /usr/local/swig svn is in /usr/local/subversion/b

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-16 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Wilfredo Sánchez wrote: gump group created: [moof:/usr/local/gump] wsanchez% nicl . / > cd /groups/gump /groups/gump > . name: gump gid: 100 passwd: * users: wsanchez bodewig antoine jerenkrantz ajack stefano [moof:/usr/local/gump] wsanchez% l total 8 -rw

New software on moof (Re: Gump on moof)

2004-03-16 Thread Wilfredo Sánchez
Some new software on moof: apr, apr-util, httpd are in /usr/local/apache bdb is in /usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.2 expat is in /usr/local/expat libxml2 is in /usr/local/libxml neon is in /usr/local/neon swig is in /usr/local/swig svn is in /usr/local/subversion/bin gpg is in /usr/local

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-16 Thread Wilfredo Sánchez
gump group created: [moof:/usr/local/gump] wsanchez% nicl . / > cd /groups/gump /groups/gump > . name: gump gid: 100 passwd: * users: wsanchez bodewig antoine jerenkrantz ajack stefano [moof:/usr/local/gump] wsanchez% l total 8 -rw-r--r-- 1 ajack gump

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-16 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> No need to bug infrastructure for those things now, since I have root on > moof. Tell me what you need: Ok, but they wished to be kept informed, so please do. > - SVN client Please. > - Maven I can handle this. > - email Hmm, what was I thinking? Gumpy uses SMTP. Do we have an *inter

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-15 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: When there is something on moof to redirect to, we can add the proxy to the configuration. Hopefully that won't be for too long, and we can get GUMP running within the data center. FWIIW: There has been content in there [/usr/local/gump/public/results] since Friday when

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-15 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Noel J. Bergman wrote: FWIIW: There has been content in there [/usr/local/gump/public/results] since Friday when I installed Gump and asked for this change. That's not helpful without changing the httpd server configuration to map a URL to that file system location. :-) Which is what I figured

RE: Gump on moof

2004-03-15 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> FWIIW: There has been content in there [/usr/local/gump/public/results] > since Friday when I installed Gump and asked for this change. That's not helpful without changing the httpd server configuration to map a URL to that file system location. :-) Which is what I figured Stefano could do.

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-15 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> When there is something on moof to redirect to, we can add the proxy to the > configuration. Hopefully that won't be for too long, and we can get GUMP > running within the data center. FWIIW: There has been content in there [/usr/local/gump/public/results] since Friday when I installed Gump and

RE: Gump on moof

2004-03-15 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> As for : > http://moof.apache.org:16080/gump/ > I'm not sure where this translates too I don't have access to moof, so I can't look, but I'm sure that Stefano can find out, understood the ProxyPass directive, and knows how to get the data into the right place for the URL. When there is some

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-15 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> Say what? Why would gump.apache.org be on nagoya? I hope you are just > confused. gump.apache.org is on minotaur. My confusion is always a safe bet & a correct one in this case. ;-) I haven't figure out an inside Apache map yet, and hostnames to c-names [although easy to look up] just hasn't

RE: Gump on moof

2004-03-15 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> wouldn't the ProxyPass be ok with that? > The request come in to gump.apache.org (on Nagoya) Say what? Why would gump.apache.org be on nagoya? I hope you are just confused. gump.apache.org is on minotaur. As for the ProxyPass, Stefano provided the missing piece. We need a port that will get

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-15 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: Gump on moof --On Monday, March 15, 2004 11:22 AM -0700 "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anybody on the Gump team willing/able to do this, or ought I make the request directly to infrastructure folks? I thought moof was still behind the firewall which blocks

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-15 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Gump on moof > --On Monday, March 15, 2004 11:22 AM -0700 "Adam R. B. Jack" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anybody on the Gump team willing/able to do this, or ought I make the > > request directly to infrastructure folks? > > I thought moof was still behind the firewall which blocks port 80.

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-15 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> 1) I've not (yet) set up any cron. This is partly 'cos I struggle with setting environments for things run from cron. I really just wish to run "python gumpy.py" in the /usr/local/gump/public/gump directory, but I'd like to have FORREST_HOME and all set. Anybody know how to do this "nicely", or

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-15 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 11:22 AM -0700 "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anybody on the Gump team willing/able to do this, or ought I make the request directly to infrastructure folks? I thought moof was still behind the firewall which blocks port 80. Has that changed? -- justin

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-15 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> BTW: Can somebody [I believe infr wanted to know of this, if not do it] > create: > > http://moof.apache.org/gump/public -> /usr/local/gump/public/results > > and (something like) > > http://gump.apache.org/results/public which ProxyPasses to above moof > URL? > > Thanks in advance. Anyb

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-12 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: It jumped onto moof and ran gump/check.py, and it (at least) runs our of the box (ok, out of CVS), which is a beautiful thing. Now, after a little planning, it is time to install Gumpy proper... Ok, README exists in /usr/local/gump/README and the first flavour (public) is

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-12 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Leo Simons wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: ah, last thing, can you give us an estimation of the amount of disk space that you need? [EMAIL PROTECTED] /data3]$ df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on (...) /dev/hdb2 27G 7.7G 18G 31% /data3 so that's approx.

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-12 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> It jumped onto moof and ran gump/check.py, and it (at least) runs our of the > box (ok, out of CVS), which is a beautiful thing. Now, after a little > planning, it is time to install Gumpy proper... Ok, README exists in /usr/local/gump/README and the first flavour (public) is installed/configur

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-12 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> as the base location and then do > > /usr/local/gump/[flavor]/gump > /usr/local/gump/[flavor]/packages > /usr/local/gump/[flavor]/workspace > /usr/local/gump/[flavor]/results > > for each flavor. Ok, flavour 'public' is in progress... > Please populate a README file on > /usr/local/gu

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-12 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> --On Friday, March 12, 2004 5:05 PM +0100 Antoine Lévy-Lambert > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would like also to be in this group. > > That directory is owned by the default group (admin). Fred might want to > change it to a different group though. -- justin I believe we were hoping for

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-12 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Friday, March 12, 2004 5:05 PM +0100 Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would like also to be in this group. That directory is owned by the default group (admin). Fred might want to change it to a different group though. -- justin --

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-12 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Friday, March 12, 2004 8:35 AM -0700 "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Somebody mind creating a /use/local/gump directory that the gump group has permissions to? Done. You have ~16GB to work with... -- justin -

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-12 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert
I would like also to be in this group. Cheers, Antoine Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Somebody mind creating a /use/local/gump directory that the gump group has permissions to? And please add me to that group while you are at it.

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Somebody mind creating a /use/local/gump directory that the gump > group has permissions to? And please add me to that group while you are at it. Thanks Stefan

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-12 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> put it on /usr/local/gump/gump Thanks. Somebody mind creating a /use/local/gump directory that the gump group has permissions to? regards Adam - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EM

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-12 Thread Leo Simons
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: ah, last thing, can you give us an estimation of the amount of disk space that you need? [EMAIL PROTECTED] /data3]$ df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on (...) /dev/hdb2 27G 7.7G 18G 31% /data3 so that's approx. 8 GB per full instanc

Re: Gump on moof

2004-03-12 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Copying Fred since he's the administrator of that machine and the osx man [FYI, he's the one who wrote parts of the Darwin kernel for OSX] Adam R. B. Jack wrote: It jumped onto moof and ran gump/check.py, and it (at least) runs our of the box (ok, out of CVS), which is a beautiful thing. nice t