On Friday 05 November 2004 17:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -
> +
Keep changing this poor dependency back and forth doesn't help...
Next run you will get that commons-beanutils-core can not be found in the
Maven build.
I am too busy to fix this, but I think the property
maven.commo
On 25 Nov 2004, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Update jar names for released fulcrum components.
Wouldn't it be easier to provide a property passed in by Gump to set
the version to a specific text instead of changing the Gump descriptor
every time. I think there is something like maven.final.nam
fan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 10:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: cvs commit: gump/project jakarta-turbine-fulcrum.xml
>
>
> On 25 Nov 2004, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Update jar names for released fulc
between
the two, correct?
> -Original Message-
> From: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 10:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re; cvs commit: gump/project jakarta-turbine-fulcrum.xml
>
>
> On Friday 05 November 2004 17:00,
On Friday 05 November 2004 19:06, Eric Pugh wrote:
> Sorry about that.. I am flailing a bit.. I think I get it.. The project
> is called commons-beanutils. So, that is the dependency in gump I need.
> But, the jar is called commons-beanutils-core.jar, so that is the
> dependency I need in Mave
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 05 November 2004 17:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
+
Keep changing this poor dependency back and forth doesn't help...
Next run you will get that commons-beanutils-core can not be found in the
Maven build.
I am too busy to fix this, but I think the prop
Eric Pugh wrote:
Sorry about that.. I am flailing a bit.. I think I get it.. The project
is called commons-beanutils. So, that is the dependency in gump I need.
But, the jar is called commons-beanutils-core.jar, so that is the dependency
I need in Maven. And, the maven.commons-beanutils-core.
On Friday 05 November 2004 22:51, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Niclas, we are trying to standardize along with the maven names. Stefan
> is doing the right thing and should be the fulcrum POM that needs to be
> updated to follow maven IDs, not to just follow gump ones (which are now
> aligned anyway
On 5 Nov 2004, at 16:36, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 05 November 2004 22:51, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Niclas, we are trying to standardize along with the maven names.
Stefan
is doing the right thing and should be the fulcrum POM that needs to
be
updated to follow maven IDs, not to just follow
