To: Gump code and data
Subject: Re: excalibur-thread-impl failure in Gump
Ok, this time I got the reply-to right :)
Unfortunately it has junit, the reason being was that Gump 'jar
ids'
were
within the scope of the project, so the 'ant' was implied. Since
Gump
only
has 'jar id
resource
info
groupant/group
nameant-junit/name
version1.6.2/version
typejar/type
/info
gump
classpath/
aliasant/alias
idjunit/id
/gump
/resource
This works quite well and we don't have any naming conflicts.
Yep, well
On Friday 24 September 2004 18:16, Brett Porter wrote:
I don't quite get the contents of the gump section - at first glance,
I think the relationship is back to front: a project shouldn't need to
declare gump information like this.
It is the fact that Gump project names doesn't necessarily
Brett wrote:
Seems the problem of 'jar id' != 'artifact id', i.e. where Gump and
Maven
don't have a shared view of the names of these things. Recall, Gump had
'context sensetive' jar ids (within the context of that project) it did
not
have unique ones, like Maven does/requires.
I
Ok, this time I got the reply-to right :)
Unfortunately it has junit, the reason being was that Gump 'jar ids' were
within the scope of the project, so the 'ant' was implied. Since Gump only
has 'jar id' that is the only thing that Gump can pass to Maven. Hence we
need to make Gump 'jar ids'
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 September 2004 01:31
To: Gump code and data
Subject: Re: excalibur-thread-impl failure in Gump
Short answer:
It has a problem in build.properties. There are two maven.jar.junit
properties, and the second
Short answer:
It has a problem in build.properties. There are two maven.jar.junit
properties, and the second points at ant-junit.jar, which I assume
does not declare junit.framework.TestCase.
Seems the problem of 'jar id' != 'artifact id', i.e. where Gump and Maven
don't have a shared
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope ... excalibur-thread-impl still failing.
Time for a maven expert?
Probably yes. Maybe the junit plugin doesn't honour the jar overrides
in project.properties? Maybe it's a classloader issue and the fact
that junit.jar is on
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 September 2004 09:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: excalibur-thread-impl failure in Gump
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope ... excalibur-thread-impl still
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took a look at excalibur-pool-impl which is almost identical (and
has testcases) and it's working ok. I've just updated the
project.xml to follow it as closely as possible.
db-grafolia[1] works as well. But it doesn't even
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 September 2004 11:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: excalibur-thread-impl failure in Gump
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took a look at excalibur-pool-impl which
: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 September 2004 11:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: excalibur-thread-impl failure in Gump
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took a look at excalibur-pool-impl which is almost identical (and
has
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
db-grafolia[1] works as well. But it doesn't even list a
dependency on JUnit in the Gump descriptor.
The listing in the gump descriptor is only going to effect the Gump
ordering
Hi,
for some reason Maven doesn't seem to pick up JUnit, even though it is
listed in the project.properties generated by Gump - and it doesn't
complain about it missing either.
Since I know next to nothing about Maven, the following observation
may be completely insignificant, but ...
In
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 September 2004 11:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: excalibur-thread-impl failure in Gump
Hi,
for some reason Maven doesn't seem to pick up JUnit, even though it is
listed
-Original Message-
From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 September 2004 11:35
To: 'Gump code and data'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: excalibur-thread-impl failure in Gump
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
16 matches
Mail list logo
