On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So basically I agree - Magic is exposing a potential for abuse but
at the same time it is very questionable why someone would invest
time into setup and usage of magic with that in mind - ant's exec
would be a much quicker
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nothing slightly heretic (unless you are talking about Ant religion
not Gump religion).
8-)
In my experience then Ant crew isn't as dogmatic as it gets colored
sometimes, we tend to embrace heretics.
Humor asside, the main issue I
Hi Steve,
you are not heretic. I also hat no experience, but made a submission of
a Python sync task for Gump which was almost certainly improved by Adam,
but was working from the start. I think that general programming
experience may be more imortant than experience with one specific
language
Well - maybe its not that bad ... but all the same - this is an early
warning .. I'm thinking about making a copy of AntBuilder
(gump/python/gump/builder/ant.py), renaming it to magic.py, making a
couple of small but significant changes, sorting out what actually does
the builder selection,
The only (small
but significant) extras I can think off would be:
[...]
4) A unit test suite (like gump/test/maven.py) for whatever you tweaks are.
Since we have home grown pyunit, one needs to edit gump/test/pyunit.py to
import the suite and add it to the runner. Once done you can run the
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Well - maybe its not that bad ... but all the same - this is an early
warning .. I'm thinking about making a copy of AntBuilder
(gump/python/gump/builder/ant.py), renaming it to magic.py, making a
couple of small but significant changes, sorting out what actually does
the
