On Aug 20, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
The vote passes.
Ok, I've removed the common committer list and replaced it with the
union of the HDFS and MapReduce committer lists.
-- Owen
I'd like to get started testing 0.22.
I plan to start making mini-branches for QA. These branches will be
snapshots that QA can use for testing with an expected lifetime of two
weeks each. Only bug fixes that are blocking QA will be applied to the
mini-branches and every two weeks, the
On Aug 23, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
Are there any concerns?
Just that 0.21 isn't even out of RC yet and that patches to fix it may get
missed.
Would it be worthwhile to give branches unique, persistent names?
branch-0.22-qa1, branch-0.22-qa2, etc. Then problems in a later incarnation
of the QA branch could be regression-tested against the previous one.
Your point about automated builds is, however, noted. If this were git,
branch-0.22
On 08/23/2010 03:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
To simplify automated builds, I'll call the branch the final name of
branch-0.22. But it will be rebased every two weeks or so.
Are there any concerns?
Since this will be used differently than what we've in the past named
'branch-${version},
If I may... why QA need source code branches rather than a sequential builds
from the trunk (as it usually done)? Say:
- build qa1 is cut
- QA works on it and finds issues
- issues are reported against build qa1
- dev fixes some issues and mark them appropriately
- build qa2 is cut
- QA
On Aug 23, 2010, at 3:26 PM, Aaron Kimball wrote:
Would it be worthwhile to give branches unique, persistent names?
I don't think so. Of course the old branches will always be there
under the old revision. But it will be convenient to be able to do
svn up on the given branch and have it
My first thought was also inline with Cos's. Any background we are
missing about this?
+vinod
On Tuesday 24 August 2010 04:47 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
If I may... why QA need source code branches rather than a sequential builds
from the trunk (as it usually done)? Say:
- build qa1