Integrating MPI with map-reduce is currently difficult and/or very ugly,
however. Not impossible and there are hackish ways to do the job, but
they are hacks.
There is an project out of Sandia National Lab that puts MR and MPI
together in a library if you're interested --
Hi Folks,
The Hadoop Summit 2011 abstract submission closes on May 6th i.e. this Friday.
I know there are still some of you that are working on the presentation
abstract for the Summit, thought I would send a gentle reminder. :-)
See you at the Summit.
Avik
Hello!
I guess I am concerned as a user of hadoop that the only way to get an
“endorsed” up-to-date version of hadoop one has to abandon the community and
“trust” a commercial release with its special sauce.
I am just hoping that the community can put together a nice stable up-to-date
patched
Doug,
On May 2, 2011, at 1:40 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Also note that, on the common-dev thread, Eli Tom have both noted a
number of inconsistencies between this set of patches and trunk, 0.22
and even prior 0.20 branches and releases. In addition to the lack of
community involvement in patch
On 05/02/2011 02:05 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
As I noted before you were the first one to propose this release off
Yahoo security patch-set in April, 2010:
http://s.apache.org/5Gv
What has changed since? Clearly, the same situation exists today.
I have absolutely no objection in principle to
On May 2, 2011, at 2:21 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
On 05/02/2011 02:05 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
As I noted before you were the first one to propose this release off
Yahoo security patch-set in April, 2010:
http://s.apache.org/5Gv
What has changed since? Clearly, the same situation exists today.
On May 3, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
This patchset started from 0.20.1 has is complete superset of 0.20.1.
We will work towards ensuring it is a complete superset of the last stable
release: 0.20.2.
so are you intending to make it a superset for 203? or for a future release?
On 05/02/2011 02:33 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
We will work towards ensuring it is a complete superset of the last
stable release: 0.20.2.
Great! Who's 'we'? Do you want any help with this?
Doug
Most points in this thread are valid, having to do with the process of how the
contribution was assembled; and specific technical aspects of it, e.g. JIRAs
missing from branch 0.20.203 relative to branch 0.20. However,
From: Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org
Assuming the technical
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
On May 2, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
Some technical concerns seem reasonable. Regarding that:
From: Stack st...@duboce.net
How hard would it be to get the patches Tom lists below into
On May 2, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
On May 3, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
This patchset started from 0.20.1 has is complete superset of 0.20.1.
We will work towards ensuring it is a complete superset of the last
stable release: 0.20.2.
so are you intending to
On 05/02/2011 03:05 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
What strikes me, as an observer to this discussion, is that here
community does not seem equated with Yahoo by implication. Perhaps
I misread. Nevertheless, Yahoo retains a good percentage of active
Core developers with standing as both committers
Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
On 05/02/2011 03:05 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
What strikes me, as an observer to this discussion, is that here
community does not seem equated with Yahoo by implication. Perhaps
I misread. Nevertheless, Yahoo retains a good percentage of active
Core
On May 2, 2011, at 12:15 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
moving this thread to general@
On May 3, 2011, at 3:58 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Should we release
http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc0/?
The patch selection process for this branch did not appear to be a
community
It is perfectly reasonable for Doug (or anyone else) to vote
on a release based on a lack of version history, adequate
description of the sweet meats, or anything else that others
might consider non-technical. This is a release vote!
It does not require consensus. It requires minimal review
thanks gmackey,
There is an project out of Sandia National Lab that puts MR and MPI together
in a library if you're interested --
http://www.sandia.gov/~sjplimp/mapreduce.html
That is a implementation of MR using MPI. I saw that as well but haven't
tried it out.
I am actually looking at
16 matches
Mail list logo
