My vote (in order of course): 2, 6, 4, 3, 5, 1.
At 2011-06-15 11:19:18，Owen OMalley omal...@apache.org wrote:
All,
We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
on a page, here:
http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
Since there are a lot of
HDFS-918 and HDFS-347 are absolutely critical for random read
performance. The smarter sites are already running HDFS-347 (I guess
they aren't running Hadoop then?), and soon they will be testing and
running HDFS-918 as well. Opening 1 socket for every read just isn't
really scalable.
-ryan
On
On 15/06/11 16:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:52, Steve Loughranste...@apache.org wrote:
Regarding the vote, I think the discussion here is interesting and should be
finalised before the vote. It's worth resolving the issues.
also: banners, stickers and clothing?
+1 on what Ryan said.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Rawson [mailto:ryano...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 3:36 AM
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release
HDFS-918 and HDFS-347 are absolutely critical for random read
I volunteer to be the RM for the release since I've been leading the NG NR
effort.
Are folks ok with this?
thanks,
Arun
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 17, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Ted Dunning tdunn...@maprtech.com wrote:
NG map reduce is a huge deal both in terms of making things better for
users,
Hi Ryan, Eric,
Just looked at those two for the first time in awhile.
- HDFS-918 (now 1323?) doesn't seem like it's too controversial, but does seem
like there's a bit of validation left.
- HDFS-347 has a long, contentious history. However, it seems that most of the
strong objections have been
On Jun 17, 2011, at 12:36 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote:
HDFS-918 and HDFS-347 are absolutely critical for random read
performance. The smarter sites are already running HDFS-347 (I guess
they aren't running Hadoop then?), and soon they will be testing and
running HDFS-918 as well. Opening 1
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:01PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
On 15/06/11 16:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:52, Steve Loughranste...@apache.org wrote:
Regarding the vote, I think the discussion here is interesting and should be
finalised before the vote. It's worth
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Arun C Murthy ar...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
I volunteer to be the RM for the release since I've been leading the NG NR
effort.
Are folks ok with this?
+1. It would be an honor to fix bugs for you, Arun.
-Todd
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 17, 2011, at 1:45
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:01PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
On 15/06/11 16:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:52, Steve Loughranste...@apache.org wrote:
Regarding the vote, I think the discussion here is interesting and should be
finalised before the vote. It's worth
On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 12:17 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote:
Yahoo stands ready to help us (the Apache Hadoop Community) turn this new
release into a stable release by running it through its 9 month test and
burn in process. The result
5, 6, 2.
Cheers,
bc
Allen Wittenauer wrote on 06/17/11 at 13:27:43 -0700:
Actually, I was just reminded about the complete disaster that is
metrics. So while it may be pseudo-stable, it isn't actually usable for
anyone but Yahoo!.
Did you try to use the new metrics framework? Are you complaining
cause
On Jun 17, 2011, at 7:02 PM, Rajiv Chittajallu wrote:
Allen Wittenauer wrote on 06/17/11 at 13:27:43 -0700:
Actually, I was just reminded about the complete disaster that is
metrics. So while it may be pseudo-stable, it isn't actually usable for
anyone but Yahoo!.
Did you try
Allen,
Can we pls focus on the next release here, on this thread?
Please provide your valuable f/b to the RM abt stuff you'd like to see in the
next release.
thanks,
Arun
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 18, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Allen Wittenauer a...@apache.org wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 7:02 PM,
15 matches
Mail list logo
