On 07/11/2011 05:41 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
==
pLazy consensus of active committers, but with a minimum of
-one +1. The code can be committed
+1
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 Sounds good to me.
Something like the following?
Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
==
pLazy consensus of
We can merge 1580 after 1073 is merged in.
Looks like the biggest thing in your 1073 list is the Backup NN related
changes.
Are you shooting for end of this month?
sanjay
On Jul 6, 2011, at 8:03 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
Hi all,
Just an update on this project:
- The current list of
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:38 AM, sanjay Radia san...@hortonworks.comwrote:
We can merge 1580 after 1073 is merged in.
Looks like the biggest thing in your 1073 list is the Backup NN related
changes.
The BN-related changes are done and just awaiting code review. See
HDFS-1979. The
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Suresh Srinivas sur...@hortonworks.comwrote:
My preference is to review before commit. Reviewing incremental changes is
much
more effective than reviewing one mega patch during merge of a branch.
I certainly am not in favor of only reviewing a mega-patch
