Let's remove the HDFS proxy contrib component. It has not had a
meaningful contribution in almost a year. We had to disable the
tests in HDFS-1666 because it is broken an no one has been willing to
maintain it. Nigel started this vote previously, with the exception
of one vote everyone was +1.
On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
Btw, Alejandro is contributing a full HDFS proxy replacement (also
supports read/write, kerberos, etc) in HDFS-2178.
Which is basically blocked by Alfredo's lack of security review.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Allen Wittenauer a...@apache.org wrote:
On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
Btw, Alejandro is contributing a full HDFS proxy replacement (also
supports read/write, kerberos, etc) in HDFS-2178.
Which is basically blocked by Alfredo's lack
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Owen O'Malley o...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
Btw, Alejandro is contributing a full HDFS proxy replacement (also
supports read/write, kerberos, etc) in
On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Owen O'Malley o...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
Btw, Alejandro is contributing a full HDFS proxy replacement
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Owen O'Malley o...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Owen O'Malley o...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Eli
On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
I don't think we should remove HDFSProxy because Hoop exists, I think
we should remove it because it's broken and not being maintained.
Broken and un-maintained code should be removed no?
That'd remove large chunks of hadoop.
I already have a patch of Alfredo with all package names and
copyright/license headers as per Apache guidelines.
Once HADOOP-6671 is in it will be straight forward to bring into Hadoop
codebase.
Thanks.
Alejandro
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
On Wed,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Allen Wittenauer a...@apache.org wrote:
On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
I don't think we should remove HDFSProxy because Hoop exists, I think
we should remove it because it's broken and not being maintained.
Broken and un-maintained code
Hadoop Fans,
It's my pleasure to announce the next monthly San Francisco Hadoop user
group meetup.
*When*: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:00 PM to 8:00 PM
*Where*: USF Harney Science Center
Golden Gate Ave and Chabot Terrace
San Francisco, CA 94117
This meetup will be hosted at the University of
This code has been broken for a long time and, while it's still in use
in some companies, they've had a long time to offer fixes.
+1 on abandoning it.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Allen Wittenauer a...@apache.org wrote:
Alejandro,
what kind of help do you need with AOP tests?
Cos
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:03PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
After some work (much more than expected) and several iterations with folks
in the JIRA, HADOOP-6671 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671)
should be ready for
+1 let's get rid of it for Pete's sake
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:16PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
This code has been broken for a long time and, while it's still in use
in some companies, they've had a long time to offer fixes.
+1 on abandoning it.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Eli Collins
+1 (for a second time).
On Jul 20, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
This code has been broken for a long time and, while it's still in use
in some companies, they've had a long time to offer fixes.
+1 on abandoning it.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Eli Collins
14 matches
Mail list logo
