On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler
eri...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi Doug, Jeff, Roman
I'd like to request that folks take bigtop project discussions onto
the bigtop lists and don't greet status reports on general@hadoop
I am personally very interested in the results of
On 29/09/2011 22:38, Doug Cutting wrote:
The ASF discourages the use of Java's @author tag in large part because
it tends to mark code as the territory of particular contributors. We
want ASF codebases to be the responsibility of an entire community.
There's another reason which is if you
On 30/09/2011 06:27, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote:
Hi Doug, Jeff, Roman
Let me rephrase my point. I'd like to request that folks take bigtop project
discussions onto the bigtop lists and don't greet status reports on
general@hadoop with insinuations that folks who are working really hard on
3. There's 0.22 which is going to combine the API of 0.21 with the fixes
of 0.20.20x *and* will be the last release of the MR1.0 engine. For that
last reason, I think there's value in pushing it out, though it's going
to take time, and there's a risk of it adding another branch to be
maintained
This time it seems easy to split the difference here.
- Sufficient interest in Bigtop so announcements and discussions can/should go
to general@.*
- There is no need to (and a request not to) inject exhortations to participate
in Bigtop into random other topics on general@, such as status
On 09/30/2011 03:17 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
4. There are the third party compatible projects, CDH, MapR, EMC HD,
Amazon Elastic MR, which are all declaring compatibility with 0.20.x; no
stated plans when/how to move to 0.23+
CDH4 will include 0.23 (hopefully without any patches). I expect
9.1 just went up for vote, and holding up a release to add 0.22
compatibility seems ill-advised.
I would be willing to help get 9.2 out in short order to provide
compatibility with 22, and I think Joep already did a bunch of work to make
this happen.
D
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 4:54 PM,
On Sep 30, 2011, at 3:17 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
3. There's 0.22 which is going to combine the API of 0.21 with the fixes of
0.20.20x *and* will be the last release of the MR1.0 engine. For that last
reason, I think there's value in pushing it out, though it's going to take
time, and
On Sep 30, 2011, at 3:17 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
3. There's 0.22 which is going to combine the API of 0.21 with the fixes of
0.20.20x *and* will be the last release of the MR1.0 engine. For that last
reason, I think there's value in pushing it out, though it's going to take
time, and
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
I apologize if my level of institutional knowledge of these things is
lacking, but do you have any
benchmarking results between 0.22 and 0.20.2xx? The reason I'm asking
is twofold -- I really
would like to see an
Excellent. 0.9.2 it is, then ! Thanks @squarecog.
- milind
On 9/30/11 11:26 AM, Dmitriy Ryaboy dvrya...@gmail.com wrote:
9.1 just went up for vote, and holding up a release to add 0.22
compatibility seems ill-advised.
I would be willing to help get 9.2 out in short order to provide
The October SF Hadoop users meetup will be held Wednesday, October 12, from
7pm to 9pm. This meetup will be hosted by Twitter at their office on Folsom
St. *Please note that due to scheduling constraints, we will begin an hour
later than usual this month.*
As usual, we will use the
On Sep 30, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
I apologize if my level of institutional knowledge of these things is
lacking, but do you have any
benchmarking results between 0.22 and 0.20.2xx? The reason I'm asking
BTW, Roman I have a recollection of Hadoop performance suite for iTest (aka
BigTop now) which I have put together during the initial development phase of
the framework.
I don't see in BigTop's source tree - has this work ever been committed to
open source along with the iTest? This way if any
14 matches
Mail list logo
