BTW, Roman I have a recollection of Hadoop performance suite for iTest (aka BigTop now) which I have put together during the initial development phase of the framework.
I don't see in BigTop's source tree - has this work ever been committed to open source along with the iTest? This way if any benchmarking tests for 0.22 (or 0.20.2xx) are getting open we can put them to the same container conditional on letting them see the light of day by their current copyright holder. With regards, Cos Disclaimer: apologies for seemingly off-topic discussion, but this is about Hadoop performance testing, so bring up BigTop in this frame of reference looks completely justifiable. On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:44AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi Arun! > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > I'm all for people working on what they are passionate about, so this isn't > > to say one shouldn't spend time on 0.22. > > > > But, for clarity's sake, as I've done multiple times on both the list and > > in person to Konstantin etc., > > I'll point out (again) that 0.22 will need multiple man-years of > > development to achieve parity with > > 0.20.2xx just in terms of bug-fixes and performance. > > I apologize if my level of institutional knowledge of these things is > lacking, but do you have any > benchmarking results between 0.22 and 0.20.2xx? The reason I'm asking > is twofold -- I really > would like to see an objective numbers qualifying the viability of > 0.22 from the performance stand point, > but more importantly I would really like to include the benchmarking > code into Bigtop. > > In terms of bugs -- same question. Is there any publicly available > list of, at least, the critical > ones that make 0.22 not viable from your point of view? > > Thanks, > Roman.
