Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level

2011-01-21 Thread Scott Carey
On 1/14/11 11:01 AM, Konstantin Shvachko shv.had...@gmail.com wrote: We actually still haven't recovered from the projects split. We are still fixing HDFS and MR scripts with several jiras open. If we start this re-split now again before the major release we risk to get into the same mess, and

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level

2011-01-17 Thread Nigel Daley
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: Hi Nigel, As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many folks I've talked

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level

2011-01-17 Thread Tom White
? Nicholas From: Nigel Daley nda...@mac.com To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 11:21:25 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: Hi Nigel, As I look more

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level

2011-01-17 Thread Eric Baldeschwieler
From: Nigel Daley nda...@mac.com To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 11:21:25 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: Hi Nigel, As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level

2011-01-17 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
something else? It isn't very clear, sorry... Cos Nige From: Nigel Daley nda...@mac.com To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 11:21:25 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tsz Wo

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level

2011-01-14 Thread Ian Holsman
+1 full agreement. I think it will be a pita admin wise (due to how svn authorization is set up), so it might slow down creation of a new branch, but its worth it. --- Ian Holsman AOL Inc ian.hols...@teamaol.com (703) 879-3128 / AIM:ianholsman it's just a technicality On Jan 14, 2011, at

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level

2011-01-14 Thread Ian Holsman
on that note... I propose we discuss un-splitting the project altogether. On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:39 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: +1. The project split is a lie. On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Ian Holsman had...@holsman.net wrote: +1 full agreement. I think it will be a pita admin wise (due

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level

2011-01-14 Thread Owen O'Malley
On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: Folks, As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level

2011-01-14 Thread Eric Baldeschwieler
I'm a huge supporter of the idea. On a related note, we've been looking for the right time to mavenize. Maybe we can do both together. We could pitch in a bunch of work on both if we could get the timing right. We've got a huge batch of commits in flight now, but if we can find something that

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level

2011-01-14 Thread Eric Baldeschwieler
Cool! --- E14 - via iPhone On Jan 14, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote: On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: Folks, As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level

2011-01-14 Thread Eric Baldeschwieler
Cool --- E14 - via iPhone On Jan 14, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Nigel Daley nda...@mac.com wrote: Thanks for the offer Eric! I agree it's the right time to mavenize, but I think we should separate, but order, these two discussions/events. This first, then mavenization. Cheers, Nige On Jan

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level

2011-01-14 Thread Konstantin Shvachko
We actually still haven't recovered from the projects split. We are still fixing HDFS and MR scripts with several jiras open. If we start this re-split now again before the major release we risk to get into the same mess, and it will create more work for the community. I see Nigel's point that

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level

2011-01-14 Thread Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze
Hi Nigel, As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting headache. I think 1 relatively small change could

[DISCUSS] Move project split down a level

2011-01-13 Thread Nigel Daley
Folks, As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level

2011-01-13 Thread Eric Baldeschwieler
+1 Death to the project split! Or short of that, anything to tame it. On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: Folks, As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many folks I've

Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level

2011-01-13 Thread Todd Lipcon
Big +1. Curious how this will map to git, though - do we go back to one git repo? When we have a patch that is mainly HDFS or MR focused but will need changes across projects, can we just put up one patch in HDFS/MR or do we still need to open a parallel common JIRA? On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at