Re: [DISCUSSION] Release rules

2011-05-05 Thread Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze
Withdraw my -1. Eli, thanks for pointing it out about the vote. Nicholas From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Thu, May 5, 2011 11:10:13 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release rules On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release rules

2011-05-05 Thread Eli Collins
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >> I don't think the bylaws were checked in, we should do that first. How >> about checking them into the site repo so they get generated as part >> of the docs? > > -1 > > Please don't check in anything before having a vote.  Thanks.

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release rules

2011-05-05 Thread Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze
Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Thu, May 5, 2011 9:36:25 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release rules On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 23:40, Eli Collins wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Tom White wrote: >> One year ago (to the day!) Chris started a discussion about

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release rules

2011-05-05 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 23:40, Eli Collins wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Tom White wrote: >> One year ago (to the day!) Chris started a discussion about the >> release manager role >> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%3ch2q1267dd3b1005041331r7d8f696di

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release rules

2011-05-04 Thread Eli Collins
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Tom White wrote: > One year ago (to the day!) Chris started a discussion about the > release manager role > (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%3ch2q1267dd3b1005041331r7d8f696di370a279ff6058...@mail.gmail.com%3E). > In light of toda

[DISCUSSION] Release rules

2011-05-04 Thread Tom White
One year ago (to the day!) Chris started a discussion about the release manager role (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%3ch2q1267dd3b1005041331r7d8f696di370a279ff6058...@mail.gmail.com%3E). In light of today's disagreements, I think we should restart this discussi