With 13 +1's from PMC members, the vote passes. I'll update the
language and commit it to the documentation.
-jg
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Owen O'Malley o...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
As discussed in the recent thread
+1.
Tsz-Wo
From: Stack st...@duboce.net
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Change bylaws to require 3 binding +1s for branch merge
+1
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote
+1
Cheers,
Nige
On Jul 12, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
+1
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 Sounds good to me.
Something like the following?
Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
+1
Tom
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
As discussed in the recent thread on HDFS-1623 branching models, I'd
like to amend the bylaws to provide that branches should get a minimum
of three committer +1s before being merged to trunk.
The rationale:
On 07/11/2011 05:41 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
==
pLazy consensus of active committers, but with a minimum of
-one +1. The code can be committed
+1
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 Sounds good to me.
Something like the following?
Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
==
pLazy consensus of
As discussed in the recent thread on HDFS-1623 branching models, I'd
like to amend the bylaws to provide that branches should get a minimum
of three committer +1s before being merged to trunk.
The rationale:
Feature branches are often created in order that developers can
iterate quickly without
To clarify, is there any restriction on who may give the +1s? For example,
if a branch has a group of 5 committers primarily authoring the patches, can
the three +1s be made by a subset of those committers?
-Todd
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
As
That's certainly not the intention, although I note that the current
+1 requirement on code changes would apparently allow a committer to
+1 h{is,er} own patch:
A change made to a codebase of the project and committed by a
committer. This includes source code, documentation, website content,
etc.
+1 Sounds good to me.
Something like the following?
Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
==
pLazy consensus of active committers, but with a minimum of
-one +1. The code can be
+1 to Eli's wording.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 Sounds good to me.
Something like the following?
Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
==
+1 from me as well.
Thanks for running this vote, Jakob.
Aaron
On Jul 11, 2011, at 7:44 PM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to Eli's wording.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 Sounds good to me.
Something like the following?
Index:
+1
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Aaron T. Myers a...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 from me as well.
Thanks for running this vote, Jakob.
Aaron
On Jul 11, 2011, at 7:44 PM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to Eli's wording.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Eli Collins
+1
Arun
On Jul 11, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
As discussed in the recent thread on HDFS-1623 branching models, I'd
like to amend the bylaws to provide that branches should get a minimum
of three committer +1s before being merged to trunk.
The rationale:
Feature branches are
+1
mahadev
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
+1
Arun
On Jul 11, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
As discussed in the recent thread on HDFS-1623 branching models, I'd
like to amend the bylaws to provide that branches should get a minimum
of
Sounds fine to me. +1
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Mahadev Konar maha...@hortonworks.comwrote:
+1
mahadev
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
+1
Arun
On Jul 11, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
As discussed in the recent thread
+1 from me.
17 matches
Mail list logo
