On May 10, 2011, at 10:49 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Devaraj Das d...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
.
By far the most significant incompatibility that I've seen from a user
perspective is that setting hadoop.job.ugi no longer has any effect.
Granted, this
On 5/8/11 11:10 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler eri...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
I'd agree with this too. [same disclaimer as milind, not on PMC]
In general one would not expect to see an incompatible change added in a
dot release (0.24.1 0.24.2). I'd expect anything like that to require
community
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Scott Carey sc...@richrelevance.comwrote:
As an observer, this is a very important observation. Sure, the default
is that dot releases are bugfix-onl. But exceptions to these rules are
sometimes required and often beneficial to the health of the project.
I'd agree with this too. [same disclaimer as milind, not on PMC]
In general one would not expect to see an incompatible change added in a dot
release (0.24.1 0.24.2). I'd expect anything like that to require community
discussion and support.
As milind summarized, we seem to have support for
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Ian Holsman had...@holsman.net wrote:
On May 8, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Eric Sammer wrote:
do we permit
backward incompatible changes between 0.22.0 and 0.22.1 or is this
something we've allowed just for the 203 release?
good question.
do we allow incompatible
[I am not on PMC, but seeing that PMC may be busy with other issues, I
will try to answer your questions.]
Eric,
I think the thread
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C18C
5c999-4680-4684-bc55-a430c40fd...@yahoo-inc.com%3E will answer your
questions. Here is
On May 8, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Eric Sammer wrote:
do we permit
backward incompatible changes between 0.22.0 and 0.22.1 or is this
something we've allowed just for the 203 release?
good question.
do we allow incompatible (smallish) features to be added to a 20.x release.
hoping that they will
[Mentioning again: I am not on the PMC, and this email contains
non-binding opinions based on my reading the general@hadoop.apache.org
emails.]
It is my understanding that, from the beginning, the 0.20+security was
always treated as an exception to the normal (I.e. Pre-0.20) release
process.
