Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-25 Thread Tetsuya Kitahata
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:14:04 +0200 Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] project-subproject CVS [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm 0 on both suggestions. Go with this one for now*. And lets not delay kicking off a project for this for too

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-25 Thread Erik Abele
On 25/07/2003, at 02:05, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: On 7/25/03 7:46 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's simple: The Incubator PMC is responsible for the project. All others (can) help. No this is difference than in the past. Remember the Incubator is here to help and its OUR

RE: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-25 Thread Sander Striker
From: Erik Abele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:18 PM [...] Okay, I'm fine with this for now, but without an explicitly stated policy this discussion will come up every time a project arrives at the incubator. We definitely need a policy here, IMHO! I agree. I

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-25 Thread B. W. Fitzpatrick
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 07:23 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: IMHO it depends on what the incubator PMC does. If they *do* create the lists and the such then maybe they should set policy (meaning telling other people what do do ==

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-25 Thread Tetsuya Kitahata
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 23:27:13 +0900 Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ e.g. The XXX pmc has agreed to accept the YYY project for incubation. To aid in the process, Please create these below: