I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project for incubation.
Lucene4c is a port of the Lucene search engine from Java to C, using the
Apache Portable Runtime library for portability. The project is far
from complete, and code to date is primarily concerned with reading an
existing Lucene index,
+1
On Feb 12, 2005, at 12:25 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Alex,
Continue on your path, but I want to see further involvement from the
Incubator PMC in this vote. I am very plesed to see all of the others
who
have expressed support for the project to graduate, but so far, we
have only
Nicola Ken
I presume this codebase is substantial enough that it requires
incubation? Or because it was a single developer, could he contribute
it directly to the Lucene project and bypass incubation?
Erik
On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I presume this codebase is substantial enough that it requires
incubation? Or because it was a single developer, could he contribute
it directly to the Lucene project and bypass incubation?
It's currently about 6500 lines of C code. I'm not sure what the cutoff
point is
I'd love to see this happen, and bringing it into the Lucene Project
proper seems to make sense, from a Lucene outsider.
-Brian
On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project for incubation.
Lucene4c is a port of the Lucene search engine from Java to
All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if only to
do the required IP checklist.
On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
I presume this codebase is substantial enough that it requires
incubation? Or because it was a single developer, could he contribute
it
Preach it brother!
I am with Roy on this one.
Larry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/13/05 9:08 PM
On Feb 13, 2005, at 6:50 PM, Clinton Begin wrote:
How do you all deal with autoresponders when they're responding to
mailing list posts?
Do you kick the user? Is there a filter?
kick them
Roy
Next question, how do we administrate our mailing lists? Who has
karma for that? How do we kick people?
Thanks for the help.
Clinton
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:00:12 -0700, Larry Meadors
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Preach it brother!
I am with Roy on this one.
Larry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if only
to
do the required IP checklist.
Right.
By my question is why doesn't this go through the Lucene project? The
Lucene PMC could bring the codebase into their project and
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if only to
do the required IP checklist.
Right.
By my question is why doesn't this go through the Lucene project? The
Lucene PMC could bring the codebase
On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:41 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if
only to
do the required IP checklist.
Right.
By my question is why doesn't this go through the Lucene
Garrett Rooney wrote:
I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project for incubation.
+1. I would love to see Lucene4c take off, and making it part of Lucene
would be a great boost to it.
-Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:36 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if only
to
do the required IP checklist.
Right.
By my question is why doesn't this go through the Lucene project? The
Lucene
Clinton Begin wrote:
Next question, how do we administrate our mailing lists? Who has
karma for that? How do we kick people?
Thanks for the help.
Clinton
Ask your PMC - they will know who are your moderators.
For other mail FAQs see:
14 matches
Mail list logo
