Le 17 mars 05, à 04:47, Vikas Singhal a écrit :
...I am willing to work on projects that either have no documentation
or
minimal documentation. Can anyone help me in identifying such
projects?..
A documentation "refactoring" effort is currently going on in the
Cocoon project, see http://wiki.apa
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:17:25 +0530, Vikas Singhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I am a technical writer with an experience of more than three years. I want
> to contribute to the foundation in terms of documentation.
>
> I am willing to work on projects that either have no documentati
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-01-20 01:12:13 -0500 (Thu, 20 Jan 2005) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
On Wednesday, March 16, 2005 7:47 PM, Vikas Singhal wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I am a technical writer with an experience of more than three years.
> I want to contribute to the foundation in terms of documentation.
>
> I am willing to work on projects that either have no documentation or
> minimal
On Wednesday, March 16, 2005 8:05 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > If an existing TLP, such as Lucene, wants to develop a port, such
> > as a Ruby port of the Lucene library, can the Lucene PMC invite
> > that port and its developers under its wings directly
>
> > this port is not an existing exter
> If an existing TLP, such as Lucene, wants to develop a port, such as a
> Ruby port of the Lucene library, can the Lucene PMC invite that port
> and its developers under its wings directly
> this port is not an existing external project, but a brand new port
> that would be developed under Lucene
Hi List,
I am a technical writer with an experience of more than three years. I want
to contribute to the foundation in terms of documentation.
I am willing to work on projects that either have no documentation or
minimal documentation. Can anyone help me in identifying such projects?
Thanks,
-V
Hello,
If an existing TLP, such as Lucene, wants to develop a port, such as a
Ruby port of the Lucene library, can the Lucene PMC invite that port
and its developers under its wings directly, or does the port need to
go through the Incubator? Note that this port is not an existing
external projec
On Mar 16, 2005, at 1:13 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
My sense of these discussions is that many old Apache members have
argued about these question so many times that there is not much
interest to rehash the issues all over again.
Not really... It's always a good idea, IMO, to occasionally
re-d
On Mar 16, 2005, at 12:44 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
At 09:26 PM 3/15/2005, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On the notion of community:
The ASF considers any project with less then 3 active committers as
not having a community. The consensus on the number 3 can be
described
as very solid, if not frozen. My implic
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote:
How can a single bad project destroy most of what the foundation has
accomplished?
By having the solitary developer incorporate code they don't have the
rights to, and no one around looking over their shoulder to peer review,
leading to a lawsui
On 16.03.2005, at 18:39, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
...
By insisting heavily on community building and rigid rules like 3+
committers, the ASF may be undermining the very thing it is trying to
cultivate. Developers are drawn to the ASF in order to develop
software in a friendly environment and
At 06:51 PM 3/16/2005, Roy T.Fielding wrote:
Ceki, the incubator was created because some well-meaning people
at Apache were making themselves busy helping a thousand projects
bloom without noticing that some were weeds. It only requires one
bad project to destroy most of what the foundation has a
Ceki, the incubator was created because some well-meaning people
at Apache were making themselves busy helping a thousand projects
bloom without noticing that some were weeds. It only requires one
bad project to destroy most of what the foundation has accomplished.
The incubator weeds out the sing
At 09:26 PM 3/15/2005, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On the notion of community:
The ASF considers any project with less then 3 active committers as
not having a community. The consensus on the number 3 can be described
as very solid, if not frozen. My implicit suggestion to consider 2 as
an alternative was
Although many ASF members are represented in the incubator, it is not
representative of the ASF because it is more coercive than the rest of
the foundation. Some of the coercion is unavoidable, e.g. IP issues,
some of it mildly irritating, e.g. forrest, and then there is the
community requi
Ooops. I fell into the trap of making a general observation in a message
with a log4net subject line. My bad.
I'll follow up with another message with a new subject line.
At 04:29 PM 3/16/2005, you wrote:
> Apache is indeed an interesting place, although the incubator is not
> necessarily repres
As that one committer I am also comfortable discussing this.
The user community is growing continuously and is very diverse. The
developer community, while not as diverse as we would like, has
demonstrated that it is following its charter (found at
http://incubator.apache.org/derby/ ), is operat
> Apache is indeed an interesting place, although the incubator is not
> necessarily representative of the whole.
What happens in the Incubator informs and seeds the next generation of ASF
communities. This suggests to me that every active ASF Member, Officer and
Director should be involved in th
Even though my vote is not binding, I think the project is ready to graduate.
+1
Larry
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 05:51:26 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The iBATIS team has worked through the incubation checklist in a open and
> collaborative fashion. The community remains strong, an
DB PMC Hat On: I'm quite comfortable discussing this.
One committer has been added while in incubation, and there are a
couple more people under consideration. The user and developer
community has grown, even if the committer distribution is worrisome.
Very much worth talking about, though!
-Br
Apache is indeed an interesting place, although the incubator is not
necessarily representative of the whole.
At 03:43 PM 3/16/2005, Nicko Cadell wrote:
It has been an interesting and informative experience.
Thanks for all your efforts.
Nicko
--
Ceki Gülcü
The complete log4j manual: http://www.
It has been an interesting and informative experience.
Thanks for all your efforts.
Nicko
> -Original Message-
> From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 March 2005 10:14
> To: general@logging.apache.org
> Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: log4net 1.2.9 beta relea
The iBATIS team has worked through the incubation checklist in a open and
collaborative fashion. The community remains strong, and we feel ready to apply
for graduation.
With the Incubator PMC's approval, we would apply to the board for acceptance
as a top-level project.
Project checklist: htt
Hello,
After IP related question were clarified [1], I am happy to report that the
Incubator PMC has approved the release of log4net 1.2.9 beta.
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11096728973&r=1&w=2
--
Ceki Gülcü
The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/
---
25 matches
Mail list logo
