At 10:24 PM 7/6/2005, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>Notice that Roy said legal AND public. Haven't you ever noticed the seeming
>disconnect between having the discussion (and vote) in private, and the
>instructions to the PMC that they should send a link to the vote thread as
>part of the account reque
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
>
> > Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > > [snip]... What the vote does is three things:
> > > 1) it provides a legally binding, public decision of the project;
>
> > I am confused by that statement. We conduct our committer votes on
> > the project's priv
One more commiter vote notification to general@incubator.apache.org
Dan.
Original Message
Subject: [VOTE] Add Øyvind Bakksjø as a Derby committer
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 07:50:17 -0700
From: Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Derby Development
To: derby-dev
Pl
After re-reading the Incubator's new committer document, I think I need
to send this committer vote notice to the general incubator list.
[ reference http://incubator.apache.org/learn/newcommitters.html ]
Dan.
Original Message
Subject: [VOTE] Add Bernt M Johnsen as a Derby comm
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-01-20 01:12:13 -0500 (Thu, 20 Jan 2005) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Ken expressed concern:
>
> Please note that the text did offer either approach as acceptable, and up to
> each PMC, so I am not entirely sure of the real point of contention. If the
> PMC prefers one over the other, use it.
But only one is described as '... Best Practi
David Crossley wrote:
> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > [snip]... What the vote does is three things:
> > 1) it provides a legally binding, public decision of the project;
> I am confused by that statement. We conduct our committer votes on
> the project's private mailing list
> Is that not legal?
Ken expressed concern:
> The candidate is now in the position of being privately
> blessed but publicly vilified.
And this will differ how from an announcement that someone has been accepted
as a Committer, and people who did not participate in the private vote
expressing their views anyway?
> O
At 02:49 AM 7/6/2005, David Crossley wrote:
>Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>
>> [snip]... What the vote does is three things:
>>
>> 1) it provides a legally binding, public decision of the project;
>
>I am confused by that statement. We conduct our committer votes on
>the project's private mailing li
On 7/2/05, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 03 July 2005 04:44, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > This last bit troubles me a bit. I can't say I've seen this 're-emergence'
> > but that's probably my shortcoming in not tracking discussions.
>
> I second that having "shadow pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
> That doesn't happen -- discussion takes place in private before
> the vote even starts, just like it did in the old Apache Group.
Oh, perhaps you're assuming that the only people permitted to
participate in the 'pro forma' vote are th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Jul 2, 2005, at 1:44 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>> I don't like the idea of discussions about people's merit (or the
>> people
>> themselves, for that matter) happening in public right in their faces.
>
> That doesn't happen
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 15:49, David Crossley wrote:
> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > [snip]... What the vote does is three things:
> >
> > 1) it provides a legally binding, public decision of the project;
>
> I am confused by that statement. We conduct our committer votes on
> the project's privat
A note for the mail archives: there is a parallel thread at
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11203372062
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
> [snip]... What the vote does is three things:
>
> 1) it provides a legally binding, public decision of the project;
I am confused by that statement. We conduct our committer votes on
the project's private mailing list, following a procedure that
our PMC has agreed up
15 matches
Mail list logo
