Hi gang,
While running 'svn up' inside people.apache.org:/www/incubator.apache.org
I saw this:
Gprojects/felix.html
which indicates someone edited that file at the live location, or scp-ed
it over, or something similar. Please **don't do anything like that**. The
website management
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-7?page=all ]
Leo Simons closed INCUBATOR-7:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Leo Simons
Keeping track of changes to a track record in an issue tracker seems rather
silly to me! Anyhow, previous
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-1?page=comments#action_12365207
]
Leo Simons commented on INCUBATOR-1:
Our VP legal is working on a detailed policy about this. The incubator can
incorporate by reference when its finished.
document
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-2?page=all ]
Leo Simons closed INCUBATOR-2:
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Assign To: Leo Simons
The original patch is two years old.
fixed a few URLs in apollo/hermes/muse STATUS pages
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-4?page=comments#action_12365209
]
Leo Simons commented on INCUBATOR-4:
Let's not try and have policy discussions within jira...
better docs for new committer procedure
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-9?page=all ]
Leo Simons closed INCUBATOR-9:
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Assign To: Leo Simons
Incubator has moved to use anakia for website, so patch is no longer relevant
or apply-able.
Patch to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-8?page=all ]
Leo Simons closed INCUBATOR-8:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Leo Simons
Looking at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/, it seems this
stuff has been imported into SVN,
Oi!
For those who don't read the incubator cvs list, I just spent a
few hours on the incubator website. Mostly it was a large amount
of small tweaks, fixes and changes; no (serious) content changes
except for a bit of a rewrite of the text on the front page.
Please do review and change (back)
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Manuel Mall wrote:
On the grant form is says: Licensor owns or has sufficient
rights to contribute the software source code. In this case we don't
have a single Licensor but a group of people. How does the form work in
such a case as it seems to make the assumption that
Hi Matthieu, good to hear from you. At this point, it might be worth
determining what you think the starting point is for building a strong
implementation. If it is in the Sybase contribution, we could start with a
new project and integrate any additional value from Agila towards that so
that
All thanks go to David. At best, I just kicked a pebble down a hill...
geir
Leo Simons wrote:
Oi!
For those who don't read the incubator cvs list, I just spent a
few hours on the incubator website. Mostly it was a large amount
of small tweaks, fixes and changes; no (serious) content changes
These are the dependencies for building and/or using the whole
transaction module.
For example, the geronimo-system, geronimo-core and geronimo-kernel and
geronimo-j2ee dependencies
are mainly needed to build / use the gbeans for the transaction manager.
The jencks project (www.jencks.org) uses
Justin,
Yes, I discussed this with Greg after the last Board meeting, but we've had
enough to deal with lately, and we'll likely start this in March, which was
alright with Greg (after all, we just did them all in January), so there's
still time.
We'll have to divide up the current projects, and
The way this 'debate' has continued has been very embarrassing -
It just makes me wonder why anyone would consider donating code to
Apache in the future ...
On 5 Feb 2006, at 21:03, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
We have received the generous donation of a complete and
There is a process for incubation, this is what happens when the
process(es) are by-passed. A well written through and inclusive
proposal would sail thru in a jiffy.
thanks,
-- dims
On 2/5/06, Rob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way this 'debate' has continued has been very embarrassing -
On Feb 5, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Rob Davies wrote:
The way this 'debate' has continued has been very embarrassing -
It just makes me wonder why anyone would consider donating code to
Apache in the future ...
Because we care enough to have the debate. If anyone wants silence,
they are free to
Leo Simons wrote:
As long as you make sure that the questions are more obvious from the docs
afterwards, don't apologize :-)
*) IP clearance checklist - I need to make a copy of that in SVN here,
/incubator/site-author/ip-clearance. I'll try and get that done over
the weekend.
Ok, I added
Martin Sebor wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 2/1/06, Martin Sebor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone kindly describe (or point us to a document explaining)
how to reset a user password at people.apache.org?
i don't that this is documented anywhere (or indeed whether there's
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Hooray, i fixed it. We were using a 1.5-dev version of
Velocity. Now back to the 1.4 release version.
Whoa. The problem was velocity 1.5?
I just needed to move forward and the 1.4 -based setup
worked, so i used it and dumped your -dev
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 11:32:59PM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
*) iCLA's - the OFBiz guys are working on it. This needs to happen
before they get accounts, and conversely, they get accounts once this
happens, right?
if the right emails are sent as documented on /dev/, yup.
Which /dev/
On Feb 4, 2006, at 9:42 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 03 February 2006 03:50, David Blevins wrote:
OpenEJB has been proposed as a subproject of Geronimo. See the
proposal here:
I think this is a good idea.
However, I would like to hear why OpenEJB was not part of Geronimo's
21 matches
Mail list logo
