+1
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
> version can be found here
>
>http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
>
> Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1 week
> unt
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1 week
until Sunday, March 26, 2006 or until all Incubator PMC members have voted.
[X] +1 Accept the OpenJPA proposal
and +1 to lazy commit access,
[X] +1(non-binding) Accept the OpenJPA proposal
Craig
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run
Hi All,
I wanted to check what the time frame is for us to wait before
getting nervous that a CLA was lost.
The Cayenne team sent in their CLA's on the 9th and 10th of March. Is
it to early to ask everyone that's not listed here;
http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
to send in
[X] +1 Accept the OpenJPA proposal
-jean
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
> What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
> version can be found here
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
>
> Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1
robert burrell donkin asked:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> > What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony.
> > The list of committers on the proposal are the people we
> > expect to show up, but we won't be creating accounts by
> > default - we'll need to have each person say "yes, I
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
> version can be found here
>
>http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
>
> Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1 week
> until S
+1 (non-binding)
On 3/19/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> --- Noel
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---
+1 :) ("learn not to appear arbitrary and capricious")
On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > > On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> What we'll p
+1
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 3/14/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I'm resurrecting the thread that fell off into /dev/null after
>>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200603.mbox/[EMAIL
>>PROTECTED]
>>
>>So this sentence in
>>http://incubator.apache.org
On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry for the confusion: this is about the actual process of preparing
> the paperwork required by the incubator not the receipt of the
> software grant form. AIUI the receipt of the software grant form needs
> an officer but an officer
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 09:51:40PM +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
> > of committers on the proposal are the people we expect to show up, but
> > we won't be cre
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
> >> of committers on the proposal are the people we expect to show up
On 3/19/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A few observations from following the process as currently documented
> > and proposals for improvements:
> >
> > 1 this process can only be executed by a ASF member or office
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
of committers on the proposal are the people we expect to show up, but
we won't be creating accounts by default - we'll need to have each
On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few observations from following the process as currently documented
> and proposals for improvements:
>
> 1 this process can only be executed by a ASF member or officer with
> incubator karma. this needs to be documented on the cleara
+1 to the general idea.
Yoav
On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/19/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2006/3/19, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > What we'll probably d
On 3/19/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/3/19, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
> > > of committers on the proposal are the people
2006/3/19, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
> > of committers on the proposal are the people we expect to show up, but
> > we won't be creating accounts by
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
> of committers on the proposal are the people we expect to show up, but
> we won't be creating accounts by default - we'll need to have each
> person say "yes, I'm read
On 3/19/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2006, at 6:25 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> > On 3/19/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:26:04PM +, robert burrell donkin
> >> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>> 3 there is no indication the
+1
-Brian
On Mar 19, 2006, at 5:33 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1
week until S
/me lets out a sigh of relief :)
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
> of committers on the proposal are the people we expect to show up, but
> we won't be creating accounts by default - we'll need to hav
What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
of committers on the proposal are the people we expect to show up, but
we won't be creating accounts by default - we'll need to have each
person say "yes, I'm ready and will be contributing immediately" before
making the acc
+1
-dain
On Mar 19, 2006, at 5:33 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1
week until Su
On Mar 19, 2006, at 6:25 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 3/19/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:26:04PM +, robert burrell donkin
wrote:
3 there is no indication the form which CLA's and CCLA's are
relevant.
this makes oversight difficult.
PROP
+1, closely keeping in mind our earlier discussion regarding earned
merit among everyone, commiters, testers, doc writers, etc.
Yoav
On 3/19/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Roy
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe
+1
Roy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 19 March 2006 20:46, Leo Simons wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 07:41:04AM +, James Strachan wrote:
> > (i) don't use the incubator code, but fork it elsewhere (say to
> > codehaus) and make releases there if Geronimo needs bug fixes
> > (ii) Geronimo use incubator release candidate
On 3/19/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:26:04PM +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > 3 there is no indication the form which CLA's and CCLA's are relevant.
> > this makes oversight difficult.
> >
> > PROPOSAL: the form should include official names (as l
+1 from me (of course)
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1 week
until Sunday, March 26, 20
[ +1] Accept the OpenJPA proposal
-- dims
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
> version can be found here
>
>http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
>
> Please vote on acceptance of this p
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1 week
until Sunday, March 26, 2006 or until all Incubator PMC members have voted.
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:26:04PM +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> A few observations from following the process as currently documented
> and proposals for improvements:
>
> 1 this process can only be executed by a ASF member or officer with
> incubator karma. this needs to be documented on
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 07:41:04AM +, James Strachan wrote:
> BTW I CC'd the Geronimo PMC as this is an interesting dilema for the
> Geronimo folks too
I'm not so happy with crossposting between public/private lists (private lists
should be unused if possible) so I dropped that again...thi
A few observations from following the process as currently documented
and proposals for improvements:
1 this process can only be executed by a ASF member or officer with
incubator karma. this needs to be documented on the clearance form.
PROPOSAL: document this and add section on form so that it'
please check
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/jakarta-commons-composite-pool.html. i
will wait at 48 hours (no earlier than 1200 GMT on tuesday 21st march) for
objections before exporting the code from it's initial drop into the actual
codebase.
note that there is additional informatio
On 3/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> > The conversation on OpenJPA has been quiet for about a week so I was
> > wondering if there are outstanding issues that need to be resolved or
> > this could be moved to a vote to accept the project and what the nex
39 matches
Mail list logo
