Re: [VOTE] Request to release Tuscany C++ M1

+1 (non-binding) All the packaging etc of this release looks ok to me (though I still can't get the web service sample to work, I'll raise a JIRA about that). This vote has been going a week now, could any more of you with binding votes spare a bit of time to review and vote on the release?

Re: Re: [PROPOSAL] Incubate Wicket

Well, my view would be that I'd like to keep the 1.2.x stream as wicket-1.2.x, whereas I'd be happy enough for the 1.3 stream to be wicket-incubating-1.3*. We'd expect the users to check the changes from 1.2 to 1.3, so having the "incubating" there (and explained in the release not) seems fine to

Re: [VOTE] Request to release Tuscany C++ M1

+1 from me. Sorry for the delay. -- dims On 7/25/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/21/06, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have held a vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish a release of > the Tuscany C++ implementation. The vote email thread is avail

Re: [VOTE] Request to release Tuscany C++ M1

Pete Robbins wrote: We have held a vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish a release of the Tuscany C++ implementation. The vote email thread is available here: http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg05134.html

Re: Maven 2 repo for incubating project releases?

Then, could someone please remove the line in /www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/README.txt saying - no artifacts are allowed from projects under incubation Thx, Guillaume Nodet Henri Yandell wrote: On 7/27/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/28/06, Hen

Re: [VOTE] Request to release Tuscany C++ M1

+1 from me as well. Congrats! Sanjiva. On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 08:55 +0100, ant elder wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > All the packaging etc of this release looks ok to me (though I still can't > get the web service sample to work, I'll raise a JIRA about that). > > This vote has been going a week

Re: Maven 2 repo for incubating project releases?

On 7/27/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From the repository point of view - I don't see any reason why not. As long as they are defined releases (rather than snapshots), then they fit the rsync repo. +1 The point that I've heard from Noel in the past (not sure if he's busy travelin

Re: Maven 2 repo for incubating project releases?

Hi, On 7/28/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That is, the user must actively add a Maven repository URL that has 'incubator' or something similar in it to understand that they are downloading something that is not an official project. So, I don't believe we should allow any Incu

Re: Blaze and Openness of Standards (was Re: [Proposal] Blaze)

On 7/27/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It does seem pretty strange to be naming software after a city, though. Apache Tokyo, anyone? Apache New York? But if you have to pick a Scottish city to name it after, I'd recommend Edinburgh - it's a much nicer city anyway. ;-) Yeah, why ca