Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator

2006-08-06 Thread Rich Bowen
On Aug 4, 2006, at 08:31, Danny Angus wrote: Hi everybody, I don't have a binding vote here, but.. -1 I strongly object to the name, in some sense I object to this name because it is also the name of the city in which I work, and conversations about "Glasgow" will be a bit wierd. But very m

incubation process for open development open source projects [WAS Re: Glasgow - community? specs? other issues?]

2006-08-06 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 8/5/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/4/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eelco Hillenius wrote: > >> I understand that there are some specific circumstances in this case, > >> but in general I believe this sort of criteria is why we get > >> complaints th

Re: incubation process for open development open source projects [WAS Re: Glasgow - community? specs? other issues?]

2006-08-06 Thread Igor Vaynberg
personally i am fine with "incubation takes as long as it takes" statement. it is your organization and it is up to you whether or not you want to let the project into the incubator and into graduation. i also understand the "need to observe open development style on apache ground" argument. what

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-06 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 8/5/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IMO the reason this naming debate hasn't been settled is because of the way in which the change from Blaze to Glasgow was achieved: it was done privately and the result was announced here. +1 I can imagine how frustrating this must be

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

2006-08-06 Thread Cliff Schmidt
On 8/4/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IMO the reason this naming debate hasn't been settled is because of the way in which the change from Blaze to Glasgow was achieved: it was done privately and the result was announced here. hmm...sounds like we should have some docs that

Re: incubation process for open development open source projects [WAS Re: Glasgow - community? specs? other issues?]

2006-08-06 Thread Eelco Hillenius
IMHO the incubator should not impose timescales or a schedule on a project but a project may decide to impose a timescale on itself. My thought is that a time scale would be part of the proposal. If that proposal is voted in, it would also mean the time scale is excepted and thus - unless urgent

Re: [howto] add a new committer (was: Re: [RESULT] NOMINATION: Craig Russell)

2006-08-06 Thread Henri Yandell
Sorry, sloppy on my part: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-roller-dev/200608.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 8/4/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Congrats to Craig :) This is the right way to tackle this I think. Just needs a reference (message-id or http://mail-archives.