On 9/12/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As Leo pointed out, 'codebase quality' is not a graduation criteria. And
(hopefully) with Upayvira as the initial PMC Chair, I am not worried that the
PMC will overlook release requirements. If ASF Members feel that to be a
concern, they are b
Gang,
I am curious to know how did Mime4J go from SourceForge to the Apache James
project, and apparently not passing the Incubator??
Since Noel is the executor of the initial import , perhaps he could clarify...
Initial import.
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 00:34, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> So Felix never had a release? I'm not an incubator PMC and thus my vote
> doesn't count, but that would raise a red-flag to me. A LOT of Apache
> issues are usually worked out during the release process.
As Leo pointed out, 'codebase
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 02:05, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I'm trying to use the just released M5.
> I noticed the following problems:
Wrong list?
Cheers
Niclas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comm
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 17:30, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> So from the Incubator
> point of view this would be an IP clearance rather than a graduation
> process.
Raphaël says IP clearance is all done and well, so follow Justin's advice...
Cheers
Niclas
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-47?page=all ]
Robert Burrell Donkin closed INCUBATOR-47.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed.
VOTE
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200609.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
> [policy n
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-46?page=all ]
Robert Burrell Donkin closed INCUBATOR-46.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed.
VOTE
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200609.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
> [policy n
Hi,
On 9/12/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know what the rules are on non-Members being mentors, but apart
from that, if the podling committers/PPMC members want you (a vote would
show that), then, well, you're in. Add yourself to the podling's status
page as a mentor.
OK, th
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-45?page=all ]
Robert Burrell Donkin closed INCUBATOR-45.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed.
VOTE
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200609.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
> [policy n
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:34:10PM -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> So Felix never had a release?
Well it had releases when it was called "oscar" and at sourceforge...
> I'm not an incubator PMC and thus my vote
> doesn't count, but that would raise a red-flag to me.A LOT of Apache
> issues ar
I'm trying to use the just released M5.
I noticed the following problems:
#1. The following code result in an NPE
Document doc = ...;
WSDLReader reader = WSDLFactory.newInstance().newWSDLReader();
WSDLSource src = reader.createWSDLSource();
src.setSource(doc);
So Felix never had a release? I'm not an incubator PMC and thus my vote
doesn't count, but that would raise a red-flag to me.A LOT of Apache
issues are usually worked out during the release process.
For example, I don't see anything in your build system that would add the
required LICENS
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 9/12/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Apache Felix PPMC and community have voted to request graduation
from the Incubator as a TLP.
Has Felix ever issued a release? I know that the latest status report
said that was planned, but I don't recall that happ
On 9/12/06, Raphaël Luta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Discussions have already happened in both the Grafitto and the
Jackrabbit communities to "move" development of the JCR mapping
functionality into the Jaskrabbit community and the feedback seemed
positive on both ends.
Generally, if both commun
On 9/12/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Apache Felix PPMC and community have voted to request graduation
from the Incubator as a TLP.
Has Felix ever issued a release? I know that the latest status report
said that was planned, but I don't recall that happening. -- justin
---
Upayavira wrote:
[X] +1 Propose to board to accept Felix as a TLP
[ ] 0 Abstain
[ ] -1 Do not propose to board to accept Felix as a TLP
-Alex
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAI
The Apache Felix PPMC and community have voted to request graduation
from the Incubator as a TLP.
Vote summary is shown at:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-felix-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
All votes were +1. Votes recorded were:
Binding votes from:
Enrique Rodrigue
On 9/12/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 9/12/06, Raphaël Luta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The original plan was to graduate Graffitto into Portals since the
> orignial submission was strongly tied to Jetspeed.
> Since then, the evolution of code and community make me feel th
Hi,
On 9/12/06, Raphaël Luta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The original plan was to graduate Graffitto into Portals since the
orignial submission was strongly tied to Jetspeed.
Since then, the evolution of code and community make me feel that
Portals would *not* be the best home for Grafitto.
The
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 September 2006 17:07, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
>>No. As I wrote (emphasis added):
>>
>>"to move the codebase *and* to bring the mapping tool
>>developers in as Jackrabbit committers"
>>
>>The purpose is not to change who is actually working on the code,
Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's recently been interest within both the Graffito and Jackrabbit
> communities to graduate a part of the incubating Apache Graffito
> project, an object-to-content mapping tool called Graffito JCR
> Mapping, into a part of the Apache Jackrabbit TLP. This move w
Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The process of becoming a mentor when a project starts incubation is
> well known, but how does one step in as a mentor for a project that's
> already incubating?
>
> Two months back Raphaël Luta asked for help mentoring the Graffito
> project and I, among others, v
Hi,
On 9/12/06, David Nuescheler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If there is no precedent that we could align with, then we possibly
could look at this particular case just like any other code contribution.
Which would mean that the current committers would contribute
their code to the Jackrabbit co
Hi,
On 9/12/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 17:07, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> The purpose is not to change who is actually working on the code, but
> to bring the development into a community that probably has more
> willing and able new users and contribut
David Nuescheler wrote:
> Hi Jukka,
>
> Just a random thought.
>
>> "to move the codebase *and* to bring the mapping tool
>> developers in as Jackrabbit committers"
>
> This is probably stating the obvious (my apologies):
>
> If there is no precedent that we could align with, then we po
Hi Jukka,
Just a random thought.
"to move the codebase *and* to bring the mapping tool
developers in as Jackrabbit committers"
This is probably stating the obvious (my apologies):
If there is no precedent that we could align with, then we possibly
could look at this particular case j
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 17:07, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> No. As I wrote (emphasis added):
>
> "to move the codebase *and* to bring the mapping tool
> developers in as Jackrabbit committers"
>
> The purpose is not to change who is actually working on the code, but
> to bring the developmen
Hi,
On 9/12/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now, if the Graffito project were to grant the code to Jackrabbit, with
no new committers joining Jackrabbit alongside the code, then you're
talking about an IP clearance process, and, to my mind, it is pretty
much the same as a project being
Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/12/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 12 September 2006 05:52, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> > Would this work in terms of the Incubator policies? Do we need some
>> > other steps along the way, or can we streamline the process somehow?
>>
>>
Hi,
On 9/12/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 05:52, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Would this work in terms of the Incubator policies? Do we need some
> other steps along the way, or can we streamline the process somehow?
No, this is not what incubation is abou
30 matches
Mail list logo
