If you tried to use the release and it is broken, you have a ground for
-1 vote, but if you expected a Makefile in the src folder, and it wasn't
there (e.g. because the build procedure is a little more involved than
that), you probably don't.
For what it's probably not worth, I'd like to
We are preparing for a release of Tuscany C++ and have run the aRat tool.
This has thrown up some files that are part of our tests that do not include
ASL headers. These files are expected output of tests, for example, we
serialize a SDO to an xml file and compare the output file with the
On 10/16/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are preparing for a release of Tuscany C++ and have run the aRat tool.
This has thrown up some files that are part of our tests that do not include
ASL headers. These files are expected output of tests, for example, we
serialize a SDO to an
many thanks for the swift clarification.
On 16/10/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/16/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are preparing for a release of Tuscany C++ and have run the aRat
tool.
This has thrown up some files that are part of our tests that do
Hi everyone,
First a quick introduction: I am one of the original UIMA developers
and am listed as an initial committer on our proposal.
We've been trying to think up a more fun, non-acronym name for UIMA that
fits in better with the spirit of the ASF. It probably makes sense to
do this
On 10/14/06, Jacopo Cappellato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert,
the aRAT tool is indeed very helpful.
As a side note: would you consider to commit the attached patch?
I think it would make life easier to many since the String.contains(...)
method is deprecated in recent JDK versions.
thanks
On 10/16/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC has voted to release a parent pom and buildtools jar
that are dependencies for a forthcoming M2 release. These would be
made available through the m2-incubating-repository to allow end
users to build source distributions of
On 10/10/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks... I have now fixed all the files in our distribution. Can we
start the Vote again for releasing yoko milestone 1 release?
sorry i missed this :-/
any chance of starting a new VOTE thread...?
(makes it more visible)
- robert
On Oct 16, 2006, at 4:10 PM, Adam Lally wrote:
We've been trying to think up a more fun, non-acronym name for UIMA
that fits in better with the spirit of the ASF.
Note UIMA is a fine name for an apache project. We have projects like
APR and BSF and the like, too. But +1 on fun :)
1)
snip
On 10/16/06, Adam Lally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However a
possible negative for this name is that it might be hard to get a high
Google ranking.
i'm not sure that this should be a factor. the brand will be 'apache
maui' (or honu or ...). try searching for any top level project
(apache
To summarize there are three votes and that from Martin is not
binding, as far as I understand it.
Only Incubator PMC, right ? Or member is allowed to vote (binding) too?
Thanks,
Matthias
On 10/14/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 (binding) on the revised plugins that include
You need to be part of the incubator PMC to have a binding vote. Every member can request to do so
(which I did), but still waiting for the approval..
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
To summarize there are three votes and that from Martin is not
binding, as far as I understand it.
Ok, I see.
you do you have to *revote* again?
or is your old vote a binding vote than?
On 10/16/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to be part of the incubator PMC to have a binding vote. Every member
can request to do so
(which I did), but still waiting for the
that's fine.
just curious
On 10/16/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't think I need to revote when I am added to the incubator PMC (which will
take 72 hours after
the board acknowledges my addition).
So if you want to release earlier than that, find another binding +1..
All,
The PPMC of the Apache Harmony incubator podling has voted to ask for
graduation from the Apache Incubator. We have enjoyed our time here
with you, but feel that we don't want to overstay our welcome. We want
to do our part to help make sure the ASF has more projects than the
Incubator :)
+1
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC has voted to release a parent pom and buildtools jar
that are dependencies for a forthcoming M2 release. These would be made
available through the m2-incubating-repository to allow end users to
build source distributions of that release. In accordance
16 matches
Mail list logo
