On 10/27/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's contrary to what we were originally told by the mirroring folks,
e.g., Joshua. So we told everyone, as we were told, to use cvs(now
people).a.o. If infra is OK with this,
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
The Apache Harmony community has voted to request graduation
from the Incubator as a TLP.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/
200610.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
--
David N. Welton
-
On 10/27/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
If not, I guess we are not allowed to make a release.
If so, that would be a pity, because we all (the Trinidad podling)
like to go the next step and
if I read the Harmony releated emails right, creating a release is step that
a
On 10/27/06, Bill Dudney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kelvin,
The release includes the license and notice files but I don't see any
file pointing out the licenses of the individual jar files included
in the release.
The notice file is some what ambiguous on what is included under
which license.
On 10/25/06, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC has voted to release the SDO for Java API implementation as
part of the M2 release.
In accordance with Incubator release procedures we are asking the Incubator
PMC to
approve this release.
reviewing
On 10/27/06, Sami Siren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
The most popular way to pronounce UIMA is you-eee-muh.
There is a fairly large user community using pre-Apache UIMA. The
potential confusion about which UIMA people may be talking about may be
mitigated somewhat by
On 10/27/06, Jim Hurley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 25, 2006, at 6:35 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
It doesn't matter whatsoever as long as you are VERY consistently
calling it Apache Braintree as you should be doing _anyways_
Would that apply equally to the two names
+1 (non-binding)
Niall
On 10/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Apache Harmony community has voted to request graduation
from the Incubator as a TLP.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/
200610.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following
On 10/26/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The Yoko community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Yoko
Milestone 1. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
Policy we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC
to publish the milestone
Just trying to help, the SDO tag is available here :
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
- Luciano Resende
On 10/28/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/25/06, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC has
On 10/24/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release this
version.
+1
:)
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On 10/28/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just trying to help, the SDO tag is available here :
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/
thanks
bit of an unconvention organisation but nothing wrong with that.
perhaps it might be useful to
On 10/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Please send in your +1/0/-1 to approve/abstain/disapprove.
+1 (just one more time for the record)
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On 10/28/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 28, 2006, at 6:59 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
the status file is worrying: there are two CCLAs pending. please
confirm that this is either an oversight or that these CCLAs are not
pertinent to this material.
The CCLAs are
On Oct 28, 2006, at 12:46 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 10/28/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 28, 2006, at 6:59 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
the status file is worrying: there are two CCLAs pending. please
confirm that this is either an oversight or that these
On Oct 28, 2006, at 6:59 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
the status file is worrying: there are two CCLAs pending. please
confirm that this is either an oversight or that these CCLAs are not
pertinent to this material.
The CCLAs are pertinent and were sent to Jim on 2005-12-28 as
recorded
+1 (travel delayed)
Roy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
17 matches
Mail list logo
