APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:08:18PM -0500, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> [...]
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Issue detected (please provide details)
+1
> [...]
--
Peter Jones
IONA Technologies Inc.
E-Mail: ma
On 12/12/06, Karl Pauls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The asc and KEYS files are available on the page now.
Please start reviewing our release again. The URL stays the same:
http://people.apache.org/~rickhall/felix-0.8.0-incubator.html
Robert's "notes and comments" are duly noted by the Felix co
Karl Pauls wrote:
The asc and KEYS files are available on the page now.
Please start reviewing our release again. The URL stays the same:
http://people.apache.org/~rickhall/felix-0.8.0-incubator.html
regards,
Karl
On 12/12/06, Karl Pauls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Not quite there yet.
On 12/13/06, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Based on conversations with various people, the Apache CXF Team decided to
change the release notes in RC3 to add a disclaimer about the level of
support for the JAX-WS API's since no TCK tests have been run. The ONLY
change made to the branc
I can see what you are saying, but I still think its wrong. The fact
is that once you've given people 72 hours to find the bugs, fixed all
the bugs they have found, I don't think you need another 72 hours.
After that it should just be a short time to let people have a chance
to rereview if they ne
On 11/16/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jason,
On Nov 15, 2006, at 10:55 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On 15 Nov 06, at 8:34 PM 15 Nov 06, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
>> Hate to quibble, but incubating is a gerund used as an adjective. ;-)
>>
>> I also think of alpha and beta as
On 12/11/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hen
I'm just following what I considered was the procedure. I'm happy to
take your advice, but I would have thought that the incubator list
needed the opportunity to vote.
They just need the opportunity to -1. It's more efficient to just
n
+1
On 12/11/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've updates the release candidate here:
http://people.apache.org/~pzf/synapse/0.90/
This now includes the DISCLAIMER in the META-INF/ of synapse...mar
And here is my +1.
Paul
On 12/10/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> T
＋1
Based on conversations with various people, the Apache CXF Team decided to
change the release notes in RC3 to add a disclaimer about the level of
support for the JAX-WS API's since no TCK tests have been run. The ONLY
change made to the branch was the release_notes.txt file. However, tha
As long as it makes some sense in english am ok :) hopefully noone
will i18n-ize the name of the file :)
-- dims
On 11/16/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jason,
On Nov 15, 2006, at 10:55 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On 15 Nov 06, at 8:34 PM 15 Nov 06, Craig L Russell wrote:
+1
On 12/13/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 12, 2006, at 11:08 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
> [ ] -1 Issue detected (please provide details)
>
>
+1
--
On Dec 12, 2006, at 11:08 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1
[ ] -1 Issue detected (please provide details)
+1
-
To unsubsc
On 12/13/06, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey,
I'm just trying to familiarise myself what it really means to be an
incubated project and came across this:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ExitingIncubator
* Note: incubator projects are not permitted to issue an official
Release. Tes
+1
...ant
On 12/12/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've updates the release candidate here:
http://people.apache.org/~pzf/synapse/0.90/
This now includes the DISCLAIMER in the META-INF/ of synapse...mar
And here is my +1.
Paul
On 12/10/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm +1 now (non-binding). Looks good.
Dan
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 01:32, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> I've updates the release candidate here:
> http://people.apache.org/~pzf/synapse/0.90/
>
> This now includes the DISCLAIMER in the META-INF/ of synapse...mar
>
> And here is my +1.
>
> Paul
>
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 12:08 PM
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 4)
>
>
>
> Based on conversations with vari
+1
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Based on conversations with various people, the Apache CXF Team decided to
change the release notes in RC3 to add a disclaimer about the level of
support for the JAX-WS API's since no TCK tests have been run. The ONLY
change made to the branch was the release_notes.tx
A vote has recently completed on the tuscany-dev list to release
Tuscany SCA Java M2. The vote passed with binding +1s from rfeng,
jmarino, rineholt, svkrish, isilval, antelder, dims, and jboynes,
and a non-binding +1 from Simon Nash. The vote thread is here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod
Thanks Paul. IIRC I believe Roy said if you changed the source distribution
(which this does do), you need a new vote. Regards,
- Dan
On 12/13/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan
I'm not sure you need to have a complete new vote... anyway thanks
very much for fixing this.
You no
Dan
I'm not sure you need to have a complete new vote... anyway thanks
very much for fixing this.
You now have my +1.
Paul
On 12/13/06, Liu, Jervis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 again.
Jervis
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, Decem
> The asc and KEYS files are available on the page now.
>
> Please start reviewing our release again. The URL stays the same:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rickhall/felix-0.8.0-incubator.html
+1
-- minor (fix in HEAD) --
a number of package.html's are IMHO creative enough to be
copyrightable. i
+1 again.
Jervis
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 12:08 PM
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 4)
>
>
>
> Based on conversa
+1
On 12/13/06, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Based on conversations with various people, the Apache CXF Team decided to
change the release notes in RC3 to add a disclaimer about the level of
support for the JAX-WS API's since no TCK tests have been run. The ONLY
change made to the
Hey,
I'm just trying to familiarise myself what it really means to be an
incubated project and came across this:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ExitingIncubator
* Note: incubator projects are not permitted to issue an official
Release. Test snapshots (however good the quality) and Release plans
25 matches
Mail list logo
