More and more ASF Members continue to join the Incubator PMC to help
shephard projects through the process. ActiveMQ is the latest of a recent
string of ASF Projects asking to go TLP. Solr requested graduation to the
Lucene project. Synapse graduated to the WS project.
Agila has been placed int
"Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The Solr community has voted and believes Solr is ready for graduation
> from the Incubator and has met all incubation requirements, and the
> Lucene PMC has voted to accept Solr.
>
> The Solr podling is therefore requesting to graduate from the
> Incub
-1 (non-binding)
Issues:
1) We shouldnt' be voting on SNAPSHOT's. We need to be voting on the final
artifacts that will be put in the non-snapshot repository.
2) The -sources jars do not have the proper NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, and LICENSE
files in them.
3) Nothing is signed.
4) All the so
It's been more than the 48 hours required [1], so I'll go ahead and
close this thread and let the project know that the code has been
cleared for import.
regards,
-jean
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> IBM has contributed system
Hi all,
the Trinidad community voted on and approved to release the the maven2
plugins as a milestone1 release. These plugins are required for the maven2
build of the "core" code of the Trinidad Podling. To fulfill the incubator
guides, we like to ask you guys, the Incubator PMC, for a permission
More and more ASF Members continue to join the Incubator PMC to help
shephard projects through the process. ActiveMQ is the latest of a recent
string of ASF Projects asking to go TLP. Solr requested graduation to the
Lucene project. Synapse graduated to the WS project.
Agila has been placed int
+1
Doug
Yonik Seeley wrote:
The Solr community has voted and believes Solr is ready for graduation
from the Incubator and has met all incubation requirements, and the
Lucene PMC has voted to accept Solr.
The Solr podling is therefore requesting to graduate from the
Incubator to become an Apach
More and more ASF Members continue to join the Incubator PMC to help
shephard projects through the process. ActiveMQ is the latest of a recent
string of ASF Projects asking to go TLP. Solr requested graduation to the
Lucene project. Synapse graduated to the WS project.
Agila has been placed int
Vote passes!
I'll forward the resolution to the board :-)
+1: [
Henri Yandell
Alex Karasulu
James Strachan
Davanum Srinivas
Paul Fremantle
Dain Sundstrom
Brian McCallister
Robert Burrell Donkin
David Blevins
Jason va
> To the best of my knowledge, UIMA didn't report until November, so that
> would be November, December, January, with quarterlies starting in April.
> *IF* they get January in on time.
No need for the last sentence. They already had, as I previously noted.
:-) Just a bad edit before posting. I
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> On 1/9/07, Upayavira wrote:
> > We submitted Oct/Nov/Dec, which was the first three months of
> > Incubation. Therefore, the next would be March.
> We could be wrong of course.
The dangers of tracking meta-data in too many places. The reporting
schedule (http://wiki.ap
Garrett Rooney wrote:
> Lucene4c was closed down months ago, I imagine it should no longer be
> on the list.
Thanks. Sorry, I missed that when I was cross-referencing the wiki against
http://incubator.apache.org/projects. And Wicket seems to be OK. As best I
can tell, cross-referencing the var
Hello Ant,
inside the Trinidad / ADFFACES podling we are following the pattern,
discussed on:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
Inside of Apache MyFaces and Shale (for instance) we do the vote on
the private@ list and "only" announce it on our public lists.
For a podling I really lik
What is the current recommended best practice for a podling to vote in a new
committer?
The "Voting in a new committer" section at
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
it suggests a private discussion followed by a public pro-forma vote, and it
has a link to discussion thread about this [
From our wicket-priv mailinglist:
On 1/9/07, Upayavira wrote:
We submitted Oct/Nov/Dec, which was the first three months of
Incubation. Therefore, the next would be March.
We could be wrong of course.
Martijn
On 1/15/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
C'mon, Folks!
The reports
On 1/15/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
C'mon, Folks!
The reports are overdue again. Yoav did the grunt work, preparing
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2007
and the rest of the initial 2007 reporting pages. Felix, UIMA, NMaven and
Graffito have reported. Agila and A
C'mon, Folks!
The reports are overdue again. Yoav did the grunt work, preparing
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2007
and the rest of the initial 2007 reporting pages. Felix, UIMA, NMaven and
Graffito have reported. Agila and AltRMI are going formally dormant.
Where are Ivy, Wicket,
--- Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2007, at 5:35 AM, Chris Howe wrote:
>
> Ah. Well, you know, OFBiz is a bit of a different
> kind of project
> from a lot of other ASF projects, so the fact that
> our "default
> mechanisms" might not apply that well is not so
> surprisin
On Jan 15, 2007, at 5:35 AM, Chris Howe wrote:
The purpose of the other project is to be a sort of
impromptu venue for collaboration of things related to
the ASF project. The ASF project in question (The
Apache Open for Business Project - OFBiz), has a
history of being relatively stable in SVN.
19 matches
Mail list logo
