[STATUS] (incubator) Wed May 23 23:56:47 2007

2007-05-23 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $] Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/ Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ [note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODE 1.0

2007-05-23 Thread Paul Fremantle
+1 from me! Paul On 5/22/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 from me? (or did i vote before :) -- dims On 5/21/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All the listed issues have been solved for a few days now. Robert mentioned > being offline this week so could somebody

Re: [VOTE] second try Change "Mentor" to "Mentors" in Incubator Policy

2007-05-23 Thread Martijn Dashorst
[X ] +1 Accept the changes -- Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For a

Re: [VOTE] second try Change "Mentor" to "Mentors" in Incubator Policy

2007-05-23 Thread Craig L Russell
On May 22, 2007, at 10:59 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: I've updated this proposal to explicitly include the possibility of a single Mentor. Since this change affects Policy, another vote is needed. Please review the changes in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ INCUBATOR-60 and vote to

Re: Branding Guide clarification (was Re: to brand or not to brand?)

2007-05-23 Thread Xavier Hanin
On 5/23/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/23/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It makes sense, indeed. But I think it would be nice to have something in > the branding guide more clearly understandable. > So, maybe I should ask the question to the PRC, and open a

[jira] Created: (INCUBATOR-65) Branding Guide clarification

2007-05-23 Thread Xavier Hanin (JIRA)
Branding Guide clarification Key: INCUBATOR-65 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-65 Project: Incubator Issue Type: Improvement Components: site Reporter: Xavier Hanin As

Re: Branding Guide clarification (was Re: to brand or not to brand?)

2007-05-23 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On 5/23/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It makes sense, indeed. But I think it would be nice to have something in the branding guide more clearly understandable. So, maybe I should ask the question to the PRC, and open a JIRA issue to put their answers or some examples in the brand

Branding Guide clarification (was Re: to brand or not to brand?)

2007-05-23 Thread Xavier Hanin
On 5/23/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/22/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mmm, it's still not completely clear. Is the phrase "However, the > Public Relations Committee MUST review any releases by affiliated > organizations or groups to ensure they comply with

Re: to brand or not to brand?

2007-05-23 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On 5/22/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mmm, it's still not completely clear. Is the phrase "However, the Public Relations Committee MUST review any releases by affiliated organizations or groups to ensure they comply with these branding guidelines." referring to press release announc