On Sep 15, 2007, at 10:03 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
That previous discussion was about including a JXTA dependency,
for this one
I think we're just following what we've seen other Apache
projects that
support ws-security are doing, so I guess we were assuming was
On Sep 15, 2007, at 10:27 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
There was a discussion earlier this year about Tuscany,
BouncyCastle,
and a patented IDEA algorithm implemented by BouncyCastle --
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/
On 9/16/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I don't see a an unencumbered BouncyCastle distribution which is not
encumbered.
Is there any reason we can't just make one? The license seems ok for that:
http://www.bouncycastle.org/licence.html. Is it just the one class in the
On Sep 16, 2007, at 11:37 AM, ant elder wrote:
On 9/16/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I don't see a an unencumbered BouncyCastle distribution which is not
encumbered.
Is there any reason we can't just make one? The license seems ok
for that:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Sep 15, 2007, at 10:03 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
E.g. those projects which ship openssl binaries must do so by inhibiting
the IDEA/MDC2/RC5 algorithms, which is trivial. Do the bouncycastle jar
distros have a similar segregation? An unencumbered flavor we can
I'll be posting it tomorrow, so please review the current reports.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You ought to be able to use the JAMES export notification as a sample, since
we worked with Cliff to do it.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
