Niclas Hedhman wrote:
[...]
>
> b) I can't say that I understand the technical merits of the proposal, and
> just see the headline "analyzing large data sets". And I would like to know
> the relationship with UIMA's statement "... analyze large volumes of
> unstructured information..." and hear
Yes I also looked at this, and I believe its enough that they fixed it
for the next release.
Here is my +1
Paul
On 9/23/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/23/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sep 21, 2007, at 3:06 AM, ant elder wrote:
> >
> > > The Tusca
I have fixed these issues in trunk (revision #578595) and in the
release branch (revision #578594)
On 9/23/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/23/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sep 21, 2007, at 3:06 AM, ant elder wrote:
> >
> > > The Tuscany project requ
On Sunday 23 September 2007, Kevan Miller wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> Looks good. +1 (non-binding).
>
> Good work getting BouncyCastle out of your distribution. FYI, there
> are still a few BouncyCastle vestiges that are no longer necessary,
> IMO. Namely: licenses/bo
On 9/23/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 21, 2007, at 3:06 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
> > The Tuscany project requests permission of the IPMC to release the
> > Java SCA
> > 1.0-incubating release.
> >
> > The SVN tag for the release is:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incu
Looks pretty good, thanks a lot for the extra effort of going through the
RAT report and organizing it. Checking it in is also a good idea as it can
serve as reference for future releases.
Here is my +1.
Matthieu
On 9/22/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Due to some license issues
On Sep 21, 2007, at 3:06 AM, ant elder wrote:
The Tuscany project requests permission of the IPMC to release the
Java SCA
1.0-incubating release.
The SVN tag for the release is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/
1.0-RC3a/
The artifacts are available for rev
+1 -- I'd offer to help as much as I can, but I know how little that
is right now :-(
Definitely support (and will probably use at least ;-)
-Brian
On Sep 18, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
Hi,
Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal
below. The
proposal
On Sep 17, 2007, at 5:57 AM, David L Kaminsky wrote:
Tomcat
-
We're open to suggestions regarding the order in which we add
bindings to
APIs, and doing such bindings isn't terribly hard. If Tomcat is
particularly critical as an early demonstration, we can add that to
the
propo
On Sep 22, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Due to some license issues pointed out from Kevan and Matthieu as
well as
some TCK failures when run in Geronimo and the bouncycastle
discussions,
we had to rebuild CXF 2.0.2.
Note: the main changes between this and the first take are:
1) N
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 03:52, Olga Natkovich wrote:
> We would like to ask that the ASF consider forming a podling according to
> the proposal.
+1, but I also got a couple of observations.
a) The name "Pig" is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I would like
to hear the rationale
11 matches
Mail list logo
