+1 from me.
I can't see any issues that haven't already been mentioned here or over on
tuscany-dev.
...ant
On 9/27/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java
DAS beta2 (1.0-incubating-beta2). The vote thread is here
On 9/28/07, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 September 2007 05:12, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Personally, that's my take on it, and what I've done historically.
I agree with Yoav, but would like to add that I personally have different
standards for different podlings, i.e.
-
On Friday 28 September 2007 16:16, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
IMHO the incubator PMC doesn't care much about technical issues in
podling releases, at least for early releases.
This is an important observation. The reviewers has no opportunity to figure
out if the release at all work. That is
On 9/28/07, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 September 2007 16:16, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
IMHO the incubator PMC doesn't care much about technical issues in
podling releases, at least for early releases.
This is an important observation. The reviewers has no
On Sep 28, 2007, at 4:16 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 9/27/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...So I'm wondering if as podling releases are not endorsed by the
ASF and if
the incubating and the disclaimer text is everywhere as required
then
could we be a little more lenient?
On 9/28/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we care about is that podlings get the legal stuff right, and
letting releases out without this being ok is not an option, due to
potential legal risks.
I thought projects in incubator were not endorsed by the ASF, hence
the ASF
On Friday 28 September 2007 15:40, ant elder wrote:
Anyway, so i'm thinking more of a benevolent educator than traffic warden
style reviewer role.
*My* worry is that quality will drop if there is no expectations.
So we could turn this around and say; What are the expectations from the I PMC
Niall Pemberton wrote:
Theres more of an issue IMO with projects that don't come thru the
incubator, since they don't have to meet the Incubator's stringent
graduation requirement. As an example - Tapestry was pushed out to a
TLP from Jakarta,[...]
Jakarta is disintegrating. All big projects
On Saturday 29 September 2007 00:03, Roland Weber wrote:
Staying at Jakarta will buy some time, but won't last forever.
If you have ideas on what to do with these small but active
projects, please come over to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and share your
thoughts.
Can't Jakarta just be revitalized as a
On 9/28/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we care about is that podlings get the legal stuff right, and
letting releases out without this being ok is not an option, due to
potential legal risks.
I thought projects
On Friday 28 September 2007 17:12, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On 9/28/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we care about is that podlings get the legal stuff right, and
letting releases out without this being ok is not an option, due to
potential legal risks.
I thought
11 matches
Mail list logo
