Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

2007-10-21 Thread Paul Fremantle
Noel There is a vote in progress on a new committer right now. Does that count? I'm certainly keen on doing integration between Synapse and Tuscany and as soon as I get a minute I will do it. I agree that cross-fertilization is good. Paul On 10/21/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

2007-10-21 Thread Simon Nash
The recent Tuscany 1.0 release included Ode integration with an implementation.bpel component type. We also have experimental support for integration with Geronimo. In the last 2 months, 3 new committers have been added, one is in progress as Paul has said, and one is being discussed. Of these

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

2007-10-21 Thread ant elder
On 10/19/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Paul Fremantle wrote: > > > I think Tuscany is ready to graduate because: > > 1) I understand it to have met the base requirements of the IPMC in > terms > of > >independent committers > > Apparently a bare minimum, with very little ac

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

2007-10-21 Thread ant elder
On 10/20/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/20/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ...This is the Tuscany community vote result thread which was only on > the > > tuscany-dev list but seems to have inadvertently been replied to to the > > general@ list > > B

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

2007-10-21 Thread ant elder
On 10/12/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Tuscany podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider its > graduation to a Top Level Project. > > While incubating Tuscany has made 14(!) releases, voted in 19 new > committers, survived conflicts, formed its PPMC, learned how to

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

2007-10-21 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Ant Elder wrote: > > Apparently a bare minimum, with very little active work from independents? > If the bare minimum is the "3 legally independent committers" as defined in > the Incubator policy documents then Tuscany has more than the bare minimum - > and thats "active" committers. Can you co

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

2007-10-21 Thread ant elder
On 10/21/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ant Elder wrote: > > > > Apparently a bare minimum, with very little active work from > independents? > > > If the bare minimum is the "3 legally independent committers" as defined > in > > the Incubator policy documents then Tuscany has m

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

2007-10-21 Thread Jim Marino
On Oct 21, 2007, at 10:52 AM, ant elder wrote: On 10/21/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ant Elder wrote: Apparently a bare minimum, with very little active work from independents? If the bare minimum is the "3 legally independent committers" as defined in the Incubator

Re: Apache Composer Proposal

2007-10-21 Thread Jason van Zyl
There didn't seem to be any curfuffle at all in floating the proposal through the incubator. That's a good thing. Both containers are heavily used, both originate from these parts and so it's somewhat fitting they would like to return. I'll put up vote thread later today. On 8 Oct 07, at 9:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project

2007-10-21 Thread Matthieu Riou
On 10/20/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Paul Fremantle wrote: > > > > Wouldn't the community be healthier if it focused some effort > > > on bringing in independent committers? > > > Its my understanding that the project is very focussed on encouraging > > new committers and tha