On Nov 18, 2007 12:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Here's an attempt to summarize our recent discussions, and suggest
some actions. Comments are welcome, of course
Just want to note that I have not forgotten about these discussions,
just didn't have time yet to
On Dec 17, 2007 5:44 PM, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
We've put the LICENSE, NOTICES, and DISCLAIMERs into the top
directory
of the source (and binary)
Kevan
Your interpretation works if your subversion repository is not a
distribution. IMO, it is and should contain appropriate license/
notice/disclaimer.
--kevan
Kevan
The SVN tag is only a distribution if it is published as that. The fact that
SVN is available to anyone via HTTP does
On Dec 18, 2007 10:37 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...There clearly is not yet consensus
among the IPMC on this though or if that tag MUST have LICENSE and NOTICE
files in the the top-level directory
...So it is a new requirement and I don't think we should be making up policy
On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007 10:37 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...So it is a new requirement and I don't think we should be
making up policy
during a release vote
+1, that's even part of the policy! It is just *so* annoying that
this
On Dec 16, 2007, at 5:24 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
We've put the LICENSE, NOTICES, and DISCLAIMERs into the top
directory
of the source (and binary) distribution(s), but didn't realize
this also
needs to be in the top level of the SVN tag, because we didn't
know
Leo Simons wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007 10:37 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...So it is a new requirement and I don't think we should be making
up policy
during a release vote
+1, that's even part of the policy! It is just *so*
For the record, +1 for releasing from me.
Martijn
On Dec 18, 2007 1:16 PM, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007 10:37 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...So it is a new requirement and I don't think we should be
I guess, from the Incubator release management guide, the requirement
is that the release can be built from a tag, in a later point in
time...
All releases should be built from a tag. It is occasionally necessary
to rebuild releases many years later. Tagging is cheap and easy when
using
On Dec 18, 2007 3:11 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the record, +1 for releasing from me.
+0 from me for now: from discussions here I feel like everything's
fine, but lack the time to check the release files myself ATM.
-Bertrand
On 18/12/2007, Michael Baessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007 10:37 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...So it is a new requirement and I don't think we should be making
up policy
during a release
On Dec 18, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
I guess, from the Incubator release management guide, the requirement
is that the release can be built from a tag, in a later point in
time...
While that's a good (and standard) practice, it's not quite a
requirement. There can be good
sebb wrote:
On 18/12/2007, Michael Baessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007 10:37 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...So it is a new requirement and I don't think we should be making
up policy
during a
Luciano Resende wrote:
I guess, from the Incubator release management guide, the requirement
is that the release can be built from a tag, in a later point in
time...
All releases should be built from a tag. It is occasionally necessary
to rebuild releases many years later. Tagging is cheap
On 18/12/2007, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 18/12/2007, Michael Baessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007 10:37 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...So it is a new requirement
Leo,
I disagree. I agree with the statement that All releases should be built
from a tag. Worst case, you should make the tag by copying from the right
version.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 18, 2007 2:55 PM, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
I guess, from the Incubator release management guide, the requirement
is that the release can be built from a tag, in a later point in
time...
While that's a good (and
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I disagree. I agree with the statement that All releases should be built
from a tag. Worst case, you should make the tag by copying from the right
version.
The bottom line of release management in the ASF.
All artifacts should be generated from the tagged SVN
So
On Dec 19, 2007 12:43 AM, Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...I've updated the BlueSky project proposal. Ting Peng and Incubator PMC,
please review/update as needed and report back any concerns
I have two concerns about http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BlueSky:
...weekly
19 matches
Mail list logo
