Hello,
the Cas Editor is a text annotation tool which supports manual and
automatic
annotation of CAS files. It is now ready for its first release.
Please review and vote for releasing the Apache Uima Cas
Editor-2.2.2-02.
The release artifacts and the rat reports can be found at:
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Hello,
the Cas Editor is a text annotation tool which supports manual and
automatic
annotation of CAS files. It is now ready for its first release.
Please review and vote for releasing the Apache Uima Cas Editor-2.2.2-02.
The release artifacts and the rat reports can be
+1!
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 06:37 +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
i'm currently working on some improvements to audit (yes i know - six
months late). i'm plan to use texen to generate indexes for the audit
pages. so, i finally got round to porting the sitemap code from the
w.a.o site.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...take a look at http://incubator.apache.org/sitemap.html
opinions?...
I like it!
+1 to integrating in the website.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe,
nice
+1
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm currently working on some improvements to audit (yes i know - six
months late). i'm plan to use texen to generate indexes for the audit
pages. so, i finally got round to porting the sitemap code from the
Cool, page rendering based on Velocity ... :-) ... good to have a break
from JSPs
Siegfried Goeschl
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Please see also http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ClickProposal
Comments until July 9th, if nothing blocking comes up, I'll CfV on July
10th.
--- cut ---
= Click
If it's a new project, then why does it have to be incubated?
Couldn't we just start up a labs project to tinker around with the
idea. Then, when/if it builds up enough steam, promote it to a TLP?
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o, does this photo
Isn't labs for something already inside of Apache and the Incubator
for things outside of Apache?
Angie
At 09:11 AM 7/3/2008, you wrote:
If it's a new project, then why does it have to be incubated?
Couldn't we just start up a labs project to tinker around with the
idea. Then, when/if it
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Angela Cymbalak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't labs for something already inside of Apache and the Incubator for
things outside of Apache?
labs is for existing Apache committers, and labs are not allowed to
release software. More at http://labs.apache.org/
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Angela Cymbalak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't labs for something already inside of Apache and the Incubator for
things outside of Apache?
labs is for existing Apache committers, and
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:50 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Angela Cymbalak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't labs for something already inside of Apache and the Incubator for
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As bertrand mentioned, Labs are for existing committers only, and
Angela, who is proposing the project isn't a committer.
Sorry, I saw Noel's comment about there being many codebases and
thought he was party proposing
Looks good; do you need a click-commits mailing list?
Craig
On Jul 2, 2008, at 12:29 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Please see also http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ClickProposal
Comments until July 9th, if nothing blocking comes up, I'll CfV on
July
10th.
--- cut ---
= Click
Hi,
Many projects that come to Apache already have existing releases. Some
are still beta but others have already shipped a few production
versions.
This raises the issue of how to build on their existing communities
while they work on doing project management the Apache way, changing
The following binding votes were cast in favor (+1):
Craig Russell
Bertrand Delacretaz
Martijn Dashorst
Robert Burrell Donkin
Matt Hogstrom
Jean T. Anderson
Davanum Srinivas
The following non-binding vote was cast in favor (+1):
Luciano Resende
No other votes were cast.
The vote passes. The
+1
I think this is good, as it codifies an existing practice.
/Janne
On 3 Jul 2008, at 20:42, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi,
Many projects that come to Apache already have existing releases.
Some are still beta but others have already shipped a few
production versions.
This raises the
This is the practice established during Wicket's incubation and it
helped us considerably. There is just one extra thing we did and that
was add a disclaimer to the release notes that the project was
currently incubating at apache and that the release was not endorsed
by, nor associated in any way
Hi Robert,
I like the content, with one tiny complaint. It wasn't obvious that it
was the site map for the incubator.
Would it be possible to change Documentation index which is a
profoundly abstract concept, to Site map of incubator.apache.org
which is a much more concrete and
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...There is just one extra thing we did and that
was add a disclaimer to the release notes that the project was
currently incubating at apache and that the release was not endorsed
by, nor associated in any way with The
BTW: this is not just cover our ass, but also promotes the idea that
the podling is in incubation, destined to become an Apache project. It
may attract more folks, it will also show that the project is
supportive of old releases, making it feel like a more mature
community.
Martijn
On Thu, Jul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-72?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Craig Russell closed INCUBATOR-72.
--
Resolution: Fixed
svn commit -m INCUBATOR-72 Remove reference to PPMC binding votes
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be very surprised if it does close the issue :)...
IMHO voting about where to put incubator Maven artifacts is a majority
vote among of
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
IIRC, we have voted on precisely this matter in the past. It just
seems that the issue will constantly be reopened until folks get
their personally desired result.
I agree.
--- Noel
-
To
since currently this software project is merely an idea (along
with some previously tinkered with codebases), I'd say it's a
perfect candidate for a lab. It doesn't sound like it's ready
for a release just yet. :)
When were either of those two things criteria for Incubation? And there is
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
since currently this software project is merely an idea (along
with some previously tinkered with codebases), I'd say it's a
perfect candidate for a lab. It doesn't sound like it's ready
for a release just yet. :)
When
With regards to process, what is still missing that is preventing
Angela to call a vote to get the project accepted into Incubation ? I
just want to make sure we are not waiting for the suggestions from
Sling and Tuscany, as I see these discussions and/or contributions as
something that can
Right now the project lacks a Champion and Mentors and I don't want
to call for a vote before having those. The proposal is also not as
well written as it should be because it lacks a lot of
detail. However, as Noel mentioned we are going to move the
architecture discussions to the projects@
27 matches
Mail list logo
