[VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

2008-09-10 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, We've had a number of long discussions about the incubating projects using the central Maven repository to distribute their releases. The current policy is that incubating releases should not go to there. The related discussion threads have died with no consensus but the issue still exists

Re: [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

2008-09-10 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, +1 (non-binding) Regards Felix Jukka Zitting schrieb: Hi, We've had a number of long discussions about the incubating projects using the central Maven repository to distribute their releases. The current policy is that incubating releases should not go to there. The related

Re: [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

2008-09-10 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +1 Yes, allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository Non-binding. /niklas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

2008-09-10 Thread Craig L Russell
-1 I believe that allowing incubating releases to be treated as full Apache releases diminishes the Apache brand and makes incubation disclaimers moot. With Maven, it is too easy to depend on a release with transitive dependencies on incubating releases without even knowing it. When the

Re: [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

2008-09-10 Thread Eelco Hillenius
+1 (non binding) Eelco On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X ] +1 Yes, allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository -Bertrand

Re: [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

2008-09-10 Thread sebb
On 10/09/2008, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -1 -1 (non-binding) to the proposal. I believe that allowing incubating releases to be treated as full Apache releases diminishes the Apache brand and makes incubation disclaimers moot. With Maven, it is too easy to depend on a

Re: seeking clarification wrt ip-clearance processes

2008-09-10 Thread Craig L Russell
What the incubator guides currently say about importing code http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance implies that the code that's imported has the old license text, and it's cleaned up in the incubation process. For an existing TLP, the guide doesn't apply. But

Re: seeking clarification wrt ip-clearance processes

2008-09-10 Thread Matt Benson
--- Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What the incubator guides currently say about importing code http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance implies that the code that's imported has the old license text, and it's cleaned up in the incubation process.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Etch

2008-09-10 Thread Doug Cutting
Upayavira wrote: My expressed concern was to do with the length of the committer list. If you start with 14 committers, (and they all remain active) you won't be able to graduate until you reach at least 29 committers - so that there isn't a predominance from one organisation. I've always

Re: [VOTE] accept Tashi into the Incubator

2008-09-10 Thread Doug Cutting
Matthieu Riou wrote: Ah! I'm glad someone finally reacts :) I was hoping for Doug to close the vote but anyway it passed, so let's move on. Sorry, I was on a long vacation and am still catching up on email! Thanks for taking the lead here. Doug

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Incubating M3 (RC5)

2008-09-10 Thread Carl Trieloff
Aidan, Are you able to summaries this vote so far for us. I believe we still need one binding vote. Carl. Martin Ritchie wrote: All looks good to me. +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Require: Testers with Web Services

2008-09-10 Thread Paulin Sundari
*Require:** Testers with Web Services* *Loc: Omaha, NE*** *Dur: 6Months* *Rate: $45/hr* * * Minimum 5+ years of total experience. 2+ years of Web Service Testing, SOA Testing is required. Experience with Java, Java script and Web Service testing experience is a must. Experience with LISA ITKO