On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Well, IMHO you simply erred on the servlet-api / jsp-api thing
(empire-db, as an AL 2.0 licensed project is obviously free to include
the jars from Apache tomcat, an AL 2.0 licensed project. The LICENSE and
NOTICE files from Tomcat state that
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Please indicate your
preference for accepting VCL to the Incubator...
[X ] -1 Do not accept VCL (please state rationale)
Sorry about that, but considering the list of committers with just one
@apache.org address, I
On 22/09/2008, Thomas Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Well, IMHO you simply erred on the servlet-api / jsp-api thing
(empire-db, as an AL 2.0 licensed project is obviously free to include
the jars from Apache tomcat, an AL 2.0
Allahbaksh Asadullah wrote:
Hi All,
I am on shared IP of service provider. I am not able to access any
code base from Apache Website through my service provider. But when I
try to access the same svn through office it work fine.
Is this the problem because of shared IP. I tried checking out
Today i wanted a list of all projects that are
currently in incubation. However that is not easy.
The two main places are:
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
[2] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
However some podlings are missing from both lists.
I reviewed the general@
I'd reckon that we all now agree that the tomcat jars can be included.
Assuming that they have not included the jars incorrectly.
I will check that the jars in question are those released by tomcat.
Perhaps it would be better to double-check with legal?
If the jars are ASL licensed, I do
The only reason I suggested including the sigs in the source distro is
because a source build like Apache ServiceMix depends on hundreds of
third party dependencies.. so an end user would need to end up
trusting LOTs different signatures to get ServiceMix to build.
It would be easier if the end
Eclipse does something like this, doesn't it? When you install a
plugin, it asks you to accept the license terms for all the stuff
that's being imported. Couldn't maven do something similar?
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only reason I suggested
On 22/09/2008, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only reason I suggested including the sigs in the source distro is
because a source build like Apache ServiceMix depends on hundreds of
third party dependencies.. so an end user would need to end up
trusting LOTs different signatures
Bertrand,
On Sep 22, 2008, at 3:42 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Sorry about that, but considering the list of committers with just one
@apache.org address, I think three mentors are required.
There are currently two @apache.org folks which I'd consider mentoring
and that would be
Olio is short and easy. I don't like the hodgepdge defintion. But then
the dictionary also says medley, potpourri etc. which have more
positive connotations.
So either Ketero or Olio is fine.
Shanti
On 09/20/08 09:52, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
We seem to have some way to check these
Just in case nobody mentioned this to you yet: Olio is the Finnish
word for object as in object relational database or object-
oriented programming. You may or may not find this suitable. :-)
Unfortunately, it also means that there are quite a few Finnish IT
companies with the word olio
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, sebb wrote:
On 22/09/2008, Thomas Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd reckon that we all now agree that the tomcat jars can be included.
Assuming that they have not included the jars incorrectly.
I will check that the jars in question are those released by
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:12 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/09/2008, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only reason I suggested including the sigs in the source distro is
because a source build like Apache ServiceMix depends on hundreds of
third party dependencies.. so an
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 9:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Justin,
we would be glad to welcome you as a mentor for catacomb incubation process!
Your idea to fold catacomb into the HTTP
Server Project is realy nice, maybe later in the incubation process we could
start a discussion
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 19:52 +0200, Jukka Zitting wrote:
HI,
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiram suggested to put the signatures into the source, which in turn is
also distributed from the repo.
It's not. The sources you build come
On Sep 22, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Bertrand,
On Sep 22, 2008, at 3:42 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Sorry about that, but considering the list of committers with just
one
@apache.org address, I think three mentors are required.
There are currently two @apache.org
On Sep 19, 2008, at 12:36 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
This item has been out for discussion for a few weeks. Please
indicate your preference for accepting VCL to the Incubator.
Proposal is included below for posterity. We're looking for a few
more mentors. If there is discussion please
On 22/09/2008, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:12 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/09/2008, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only reason I suggested including the sigs in the source distro is
because a source build like Apache
On 21/09/2008, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 19:52 +0200, Jukka Zitting wrote:
HI,
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiram suggested to put the signatures into the source, which in turn is
Thanks Kevan.
I'll call the vote after its baked a little longer and Bertrand
provides his input.
On Sep 22, 2008, at 2:21 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Sep 22, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Bertrand,
On Sep 22, 2008, at 3:42 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Sorry about that,
This is a proposal to enter the incubator.
See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DroidsProposal for the most
up-to-date version.
As Champion we have Grant Ingersoll gsingers at apache dot org from
the ASF.
Droids is an Apache Labs project and we are still looking for some
mentors for this
This sounds good to me.
Are you planning to run Droids on top of Hadoop? If not, why not?
Thanks,
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Thorsten Scherler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday,
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 14:31 -0700, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
This sounds good to me.
Are you planning to run Droids on top of Hadoop?
Apache Droids aims to be a component framework for robots. Meaning that
Apache Droids has just a couple direct dependencies (logging, ...).
However components,
-1, (Binding).
(For the reasons explained by Craig and Justin in this Thread)
Thanks,
Paul
Craig L Russell wrote:
-1
I believe that allowing incubating releases to be treated as full Apache
releases diminishes the Apache brand and makes incubation disclaimers moot.
With Maven, it is too
On Sep 22, 2008, at 10:14 AM, Janne Jalkanen wrote:
Just in case nobody mentioned this to you yet: Olio is the Finnish
word for object as in object relational database or object-
oriented programming. You may or may not find this suitable. :-)
Unfortunately, it also means that there are
Olio sounds good.
Thanks to Janne for pointing out the Finnish variants. Its getting
harder to find a good name nowadays.
On Sep 22, 2008, at 12:44 PM, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote:
Olio is short and easy. I don't like the hodgepdge defintion. But
then the dictionary also says medley,
On Sep 22, 2008, at 7:47 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
(Is Gianugo around? I haven't seen him on-list in a long time.)
Sorta. Fighting with extensive travel and an overzealous GMail spam
filter that insists in sweeping interesting stuff under the rug...
Still, listening and lurking.
28 matches
Mail list logo
