> Author: twgoetz
> Date: Wed Dec 3 02:10:44 2008
> New Revision: 722831
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=722831&view=rev
> Log:
> Update status: new committers Tong and Jerry
>
> Modified:
> incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/uima.xml
People seem to be forgetting to re-ge
Darren Hague wrote:
> As there have been 8 positive votes with no negative votes, I would like
> to declare the vote PASSED.
>
> Votes were received from the following people:
> * Bertrand Delacretaz
> * Craig L Russell
> Daniel Kulp
> * Davanum Srinivas
> * Ian Holsman
> * J Aaron Farr
> * Robe
These reports are due at the wiki page by 10 December 2008
so that the Incubator PMC can relay them to the board.
See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2008
There is one other project that is recently accepted:
ESME
You can still report this month if you want to.
-David
---
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > David Crossley wrote:
> >>
> >> You asked earlier how to find out who is on Incubator PMC
> >> and hence binding votes:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~jim/projects.html#incubator-pmc
>
> cool (i didn't realise this existed)
Yes, very useful.
Craig L Russell wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> >Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> >>Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> >>
> >>>...IIRC (and it's been a while) any member can alter the paperwork
> >>>once
> >>>there's been a board ACK. can anyone from boardland confirm or deny
> >>>this?...
> >>
>
Tim Williams wrote:
>
> Hi David,
Nice to hear from you Tim.
> I suppose you can't please everyone, but the red/green colors in this
> version are difficult to distinguish - colorblind. It would help to
> find a shade of green with lighter/darker tone (e.g. 33cc66)? Anyway,
> my nit-picky 2cen
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> IMO they can remain too close or the same. There is no difference in
> attention for t<3 or 18 Martijn
>
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> > David Crossley wrote:
> >> David Crossley wrote:
> >>
> >> ...I am happy with the result.
> >> See http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.
ok, i've asked rene to take this over and move with it. etch people
would need access
to continuum or hudson. is there a short answer to what's the diff
between the two?
our needs are modest. we have an ant based build and a few external
dependences.
windows is our current build environment as
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 11:25 +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ...IIRC (and it's been a while) any member can alter the paperwork once
> > there's been a board ACK. can anyone from boardland confirm or deny
On Dec 3, 2008, at 2:38 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...IIRC (and it's been a while) any member can alter the paperwork
once
Hello Sanjiva
Following your suggestion I have sent a request to champion the POLOKA
project to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am not sure what the next step will be because, obviously, I cannot
subscribe to the private lists.
Cheers
Serge
-Original Message-
From: Sanjiva We
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 10:30:39 am Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> As PMC chair, you should have the karma to update this information
> yourself.
Yea, but "policy" kind of states that only the PMC chair of the project should
be updating their parts unless the PMC chair is busy/missing
Hi Dan,
As PMC chair, you should have the karma to update this information
yourself.
Craig
On Dec 2, 2008, at 6:20 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 6:17:18 pm David Crossley wrote:
Darren Hague wrote:
As there have been 8 positive votes with no negative votes, I
would
IMO they can remain too close or the same. There is no difference in
attention for t<3 or 18 wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:30 AM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> David Crossley wrote:
>> ...I am happy with the result.
>> See http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html
>> after the next
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:30 AM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> ...I am happy with the result.
> See http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html
> after the next publishing rsync
What I'm seeing there is like
http://people.apache.org/~crossley/temp/clutch-care.p
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:30 AM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> >
>> > Clutch is an invaluable tool, but with some coloring issues according
>> > to me: the current coloring schema is not well suited to alert me, or
>> > they alert me
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> ...IIRC (and it's been a while) any member can alter the paperwork once
>> there's been a board ACK. can anyone from boardland c
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...IIRC (and it's been a while) any member can alter the paperwork once
> there's been a board ACK. can anyone from boardland confirm or deny
> this?...
I think that's fine, as long as the appropriate lists are ke
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:20 AM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 December 2008 6:17:18 pm David Crossley wrote:
>> Darren Hague wrote:
>> > As there have been 8 positive votes with no negative votes, I would like
>> > to declare the vote PASSED.
>> >
>> > Votes were received f
19 matches
Mail list logo
