Re: [Proposal][Vote] Traffic Server

2009-07-06 Thread Brian McCallister
+1 On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > Good evening, > > As you know, we've been preparing our proposal to submit Traffic Server to > the Incubator for a few weeks now. With the help from our champion (thanks > Doug!), and the entire Incubator community, it's my pleasure to subm

RE: Chemistry, Kato, Wink initial steps

2009-07-06 Thread Gavin
> -Original Message- > From: David Crossley [mailto:cross...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, 7 July 2009 11:15 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Chemistry, Kato, Wink initial steps > > Would the projects Chemistry, Kato, and Wink > please add themselves to the main "Currently

Chemistry, Kato, Wink initial steps

2009-07-06 Thread David Crossley
Would the projects Chemistry, Kato, and Wink please add themselves to the main "Currently in incubation" table: [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ See "how to" notes via links from the Steps section at [2] http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#h-Sponsor That table [1] and the Wiki Report

Re: Proposal for Wookie a W3C Widget/Google Wave widget engine

2009-07-06 Thread Ross Gardler
2009/7/6 Kevin Brown : > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > >> 2009/7/6 Chris Chabot : ... > This isn't quite accurate. OpenSocial doesn't require any notion of a single > person owning something, and in the case of many products the 'friend graph' > is not even a persistent

Re: IP clearance question

2009-07-06 Thread Richard S. Hall
On 7/6/09 5:49 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote: Follow up question, I assume our vote to accept the contribution is still acceptable as well as the software grant from Paremus. So, the only necessary action is to have Paremus submit a n

Re: IP clearance question

2009-07-06 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote: > Follow up question, I assume our vote to accept the contribution is still > acceptable as well as the software grant from Paremus. So, the only > necessary action is to have Paremus submit a new, Apache compatible archive. > Is that correct?

Re: Proposal for Wookie a W3C Widget/Google Wave widget engine

2009-07-06 Thread Kevin Brown
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > 2009/7/6 Chris Chabot : > > Hey guys, > > > > Great looking proposal! > > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > > > >> > >> The Wookie proposal has my high interest, especially from the bridging > POV > >> between W3C Widget

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Apache VXQuery

2009-07-06 Thread Till Westmann
Very cool :) Am 06.07.2009 um 11:18 schrieb Vinayak Borkar : Thanks Bertrand. This project has 6 +1 binding votes, 2 +1 non-binding votes, 0 -1 votes. The proposal has been on the voting thread for about 3 weeks. Can we now move to the next step to get the podling created? Thanks, Vinayak

Re: Proposal for Wookie a W3C Widget/Google Wave widget engine

2009-07-06 Thread Ross Gardler
2009/7/6 Ate Douma : > Ross Gardler wrote: >> >> I would like to submit the Wookie project proposal to the Incubator >> PMC. Our draft is appended to the end of this mail and is available >> at: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WookieProposal >> >> A quick overview of Wookie is: >> >> Wookie

Re: Proposal for Wookie a W3C Widget/Google Wave widget engine

2009-07-06 Thread Ross Gardler
2009/7/6 Chris Chabot : > Hey guys, > > Great looking proposal! > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > >> >> The Wookie proposal has my high interest, especially from the bridging POV >> between W3C Widgets and Google Gadgets. > > > It seems there's a few mixed terminologies here,

Re: IP clearance question

2009-07-06 Thread Richard S. Hall
Follow up question, I assume our vote to accept the contribution is still acceptable as well as the software grant from Paremus. So, the only necessary action is to have Paremus submit a new, Apache compatible archive. Is that correct? -> richard On 7/6/09 12:52 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote: Ok

Re: IP clearance question

2009-07-06 Thread Richard S. Hall
Ok, thanks. -> richard On 7/6/09 12:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Richard S. Hall wrote: Hello, I am trying to perform IP clearance on the Sigil project to Felix. The contributed archive contains some embedded JAR files, one of which is covered by AGPL, which is a modified version o

Re: IP clearance question

2009-07-06 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Richard S. Hall wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to perform IP clearance on the Sigil project to Felix. > > The contributed archive contains some embedded JAR files, one of which > is covered by AGPL, which is a modified version of GPL. I am told by > Paremus (the contributors) that only two minor

IP clearance question

2009-07-06 Thread Richard S. Hall
Hello, I am trying to perform IP clearance on the Sigil project to Felix. The contributed archive contains some embedded JAR files, one of which is covered by AGPL, which is a modified version of GPL. I am told by Paremus (the contributors) that only two minor classes depend on this JAR and i

Re: Proposal for Wookie a W3C Widget/Google Wave widget engine

2009-07-06 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Chris Chabot wrote: Hey guys, Great looking proposal! On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Ate Douma wrote: The Wookie proposal has my high interest, especially from the bridging POV between W3C Widgets and Google Gadgets. It seems there's a few mixed terminologies here, so in interest

Re: [Proposal][Vote] Traffic Server

2009-07-06 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >> ...it's my pleasure to submit a >> request for Traffic Server to be accepted into the Incubator. The proposal >> is attached below, and is also available on the Wiki: >> >>  http://w

Re: Proposal for Wookie a W3C Widget/Google Wave widget engine

2009-07-06 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > Ross Gardler wrote: >> >> I would like to submit the Wookie project proposal to the Incubator >> PMC. Our draft is appended to the end of this mail and is available >> at: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WookieProposal >> >> A quick overvie

Re: Proposal for Wookie a W3C Widget/Google Wave widget engine

2009-07-06 Thread Chris Chabot
Hey guys, Great looking proposal! On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > > The Wookie proposal has my high interest, especially from the bridging POV > between W3C Widgets and Google Gadgets. It seems there's a few mixed terminologies here, so in interest of making sure we're all

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Apache VXQuery

2009-07-06 Thread Paul Fremantle
Congratulations. I am travelling so I can't do any project setup right now. I'll be able to get cracking on Thursday/Friday. Paul On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Vinayak Borkar wrote: > Thanks Bertrand. > > This project has 6 +1 binding votes, 2 +1 non-binding votes, 0 -1 votes. > The proposal h

Re: Proposal for Wookie a W3C Widget/Google Wave widget engine

2009-07-06 Thread Ate Douma
Ross Gardler wrote: I would like to submit the Wookie project proposal to the Incubator PMC. Our draft is appended to the end of this mail and is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WookieProposal A quick overview of Wookie is: Wookie is a Java server application that allows you to

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Apache VXQuery

2009-07-06 Thread Vinayak Borkar
Thanks Bertrand. This project has 6 +1 binding votes, 2 +1 non-binding votes, 0 -1 votes. The proposal has been on the voting thread for about 3 weeks. Can we now move to the next step to get the podling created? Thanks, Vinayak Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Vina

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Apache VXQuery

2009-07-06 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Vinayak Borkar wrote: >> Please add the current list of mentors here and at >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/VXQueryProposal for reference. > > Done. Thanks - here's the list so that it also gets archived in this thread: Nominated Mentors Paul Fremantle

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Apache VXQuery

2009-07-06 Thread Vinayak Borkar
Please add the current list of mentors here and at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/VXQueryProposal for reference. Done. Thanks, Vinayak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional command

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Apache VXQuery

2009-07-06 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Vinayak Borkar wrote: > As far as the votes go, we have: > > +1 (binding) Paul Fremantle > +1 (binding) Noel J. Bergman > +1 (binding) Niclas Hedhman > +1 (non binding) Mohammad Nour El-Din > +1 (non binding) Edward J. Yoon > > +1 (binding) Kevan Miller: Conditional

Re: [Proposal][Vote] Traffic Server

2009-07-06 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > ...it's my pleasure to submit a > request for Traffic Server to be accepted into the Incubator. The proposal > is attached below, and is also available on the Wiki: > >  http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TrafficServerProposal... +1 I don't hav

Re: Step down as Mentor for ACE.

2009-07-06 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Niclas, On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > ...I would like to be relieved as Mentor for the ACE project and asking > the Incubator to find a replacement. The progress so far has been > good, and I see no problems in the project, as it is largely driven by > Apache folks who

Re: Proposal for Wookie a W3C Widget/Google Wave widget engine

2009-07-06 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Scott Wilson wrote: Hi Sylvain, I'm Scott Wilson, one of the named committers on the Wookie proposal; I'm also a contributor to the W3C Widgets family of specifications. You are right in your assessment; W3C Widgets and Google Gadgets are indeed potential competing specifications for web wid

Re: Proposal for Wookie a W3C Widget/Google Wave widget engine

2009-07-06 Thread Scott Wilson
Hi Sylvain, I'm Scott Wilson, one of the named committers on the Wookie proposal; I'm also a contributor to the W3C Widgets family of specifications. You are right in your assessment; W3C Widgets and Google Gadgets are indeed potential competing specifications for web widgets, despite the

Re: Proposal for Wookie a W3C Widget/Google Wave widget engine

2009-07-06 Thread Ross Gardler
2009/7/6 Luciano Resende : > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: >> I would like to submit the Wookie project proposal to the Incubator >> PMC. Our draft is appended to the end of this mail and is available >> at: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WookieProposal ... > > I'm w

Re: Proposal for Wookie a W3C Widget/Google Wave widget engine

2009-07-06 Thread Ross Gardler
2009/7/5 Sylvain Wallez : > Ross Gardler wrote: >> >> I would like to submit the Wookie project proposal to the Incubator >> PMC. Our draft is appended to the end of this mail and is available >> at: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WookieProposal ... > This looks like an interesting propos