Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.6-incubating (rc4)

2010-05-09 Thread Francis De Brabandere
First of all thanks for the thorough review. These are all optional dependencies and we don't package them. All our code is written against the JDBC api, we don't need any driver implementation for compilation. So I don't see the problem. It seems we forgot to comment the mysql dependency in the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.6-incubating (rc4)

2010-05-09 Thread Craig L Russell
Optional dependencies can have any license. In some cases, even required dependencies can have incompatible licenses. The hard rule is that Apache projects must not ship code with incompatible licenses. So I'm +1 for release of these artifacts. Good job. Craig On May 8, 2010, at 11:59

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.6-incubating (rc4)

2010-05-09 Thread Thomas Fischer
Thanks for correcting me, Craig and Francis. I should have asked first before issuing the -1. This changes my vote to +1. Thomas > Optional dependencies can have any license. In some cases, even > required dependencies can have incompatible licenses. > > The hard rule is that Apache projects

[VOTE][RESULT] Amber incubator

2010-05-09 Thread Simone Gianni
Hello, With fifteen binding +1 votes, 3 non binding +1 votes, and no negative votes, the Amber project has been accepted into the Incubator. Next step will be creation of infrastructure for the project. Thanks to all for casting your votes. Simone 2010/5/7 Henry Saputra > +1 (non-binding) >

Re: Zeta proposal - Next steps

2010-05-09 Thread Craig L Russell
Apache is an organization that runs on email, which is slower than Skype/IRC/telephone but far more effective in widespread asynchronous communication. The incubator PMC is just like other PMCs. There is a very well documented process for adding members which is being followed. Please hav

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.6-incubating (rc4)

2010-05-09 Thread Francis De Brabandere
The vote passes as follows: +1 Martijn Dashorst +1 Ant Elder +1 Craig L Russell +1 Thomas Fischer Thanks for all your support and reviews! I'll push the release out. On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Thomas Fischer wrote: > Thanks for correcting me, Craig and Francis. I should have as

Re: [libcloud] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

2010-05-09 Thread Tom Davis
+1! Movin' right along... On May 9, 2010, at 3:14 PM, Alex Polvi wrote: On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Paul Querna wrote: Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 are available at: Please test and place your votes please; +/- 1 [ ] R

Re: [libcloud] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

2010-05-09 Thread Alex Polvi
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 are available at: >   > > Please test and place your votes please; > >  +/- 1 >  [  ]  Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 +1. Need to get the CHANGES and .dst

Re: [libcloud] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

2010-05-09 Thread Jerry Chen
+1 for 0.3.1 release. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

2010-05-09 Thread Paul Querna
FTR, +1 from me. On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 are available at: >   > > Please test and place your votes please; > >  +/- 1 >  [  ]  Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 > > Vote closes on

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

2010-05-09 Thread Gav...
No problems my end. +1 Gav... > -Original Message- > From: Paul Querna [mailto:p...@querna.org] > Sent: Friday, 7 May 2010 9:09 AM > To: libcl...@incubator.apache.org; general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 > > Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.3